From: Nicolas C. <war...@fr...> - 2003-02-28 02:41:42
|
> > ok , let's call it ExtList.init ! > > I'd prefer ExtLib.List.int > > That way, I can switch from StdLib.List to ExtLib.List by just > "opening" ExtLib in my sources. This way, you're supposing that ExtLib.List will be a reimplementation of the List module... I don't that's the purpose here. Let's just say that ExtList contains additionnals functions using the List.t type ( aka 'a list ) and that you can use them just with "open ExtList". Don't you think ? > By the way, what if we propose to the caml team that the modules in the > standard library be all under a StdLib module? Same remarks. ExtLib is not a different implementation, so switching between StdLib and ExtLib does not make sense. Nicolas Cannasse |