From: Nicolas C. <war...@fr...> - 2003-02-26 01:30:23
|
> >> For that, we already have a decomposition to follow, that of the > >> standard library itself. We need a name, a license, a compilation > >> strategy, and an installation strategy. > > I think we should be careful here. In my opinion Boost went entirely > off the rails by chosing a special make tool, and then modifying > that so that to actually build boost became a total nightmare. > > They failed to follow my recommendation:-) > > I recommended Python script as the build tool, and they > thought it was 'too heavy' which of course turned out > to be a joke compared to having to download and build > a custom tool -- which needed constant modification. <snip> > Well, we should probably use ocaml script instead :-) That's Ocamake, Thanks for your support John :) Nicolas Cannasse |