From: John M. S. <sk...@oz...> - 2003-02-25 17:38:22
|
>> For that, we already have a decomposition to follow, that of the >> standard library itself. We need a name, a license, a compilation >> strategy, and an installation strategy. I think we should be careful here. In my opinion Boost went entirely off the rails by chosing a special make tool, and then modifying that so that to actually build boost became a total nightmare. They failed to follow my recommendation:-) I recommended Python script as the build tool, and they thought it was 'too heavy' which of course turned out to be a joke compared to having to download and build a custom tool -- which needed constant modification. I personally DESPISE make and friends, I think they're total garbage. While they automate some tasks nicely, trying to fool make into doing all the build/test/install tasks correctly requires considerably expertise and hackery. Python, on the other hand, is a full scale programming language. Well, we should probably use ocaml script instead :-) -- John Max Skaller, mailto:sk...@oz... snail:10/1 Toxteth Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia. voice:61-2-9660-0850 |