Re: [Ocaml-lib-devel] Ocaml indent?

[Maxence G. <max...@in...>]

> How about scribbling specs for libraries in module signatures then 
> producing structures that implement the signatures? In this way:
> ...
> libraries nowadays only because it's my own and I remember coding it 
> (and the names of the addons)).

Sound good to me. To verify the signatures are the ones needed, each person
could look at his code and see if it would be what he wanted. What a pity when
the type of a function (for example the order of arguments) is *almost* what we
need and we have to create a dummy function, for example to change the order of
the arguments...

BTW, what about labels ? with or without ? I vote for only optional labels,
except for functions with plenty of arguments of the same type.

> - it could be demanded that people contributing to a *particular 
> structure* follow the indentation mode of *that* structure... Besides If 
> someone produced code and submitted it without the proper indentation, 
> just indenting *one* structure in a coherent way is pretty easy for 
> anybody to do. (We could see other people's practice and improve our 
> "indenting" habits that way too!)

Agreed.

-- 
Maxence Guesdon