Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Obo-discuss] Announcement of First Set of OBO Foundry Ontologies
|
From: Chris M. <cj...@be...> - 2010-03-26 15:33:03
|
Sourceforge CVS is down at the moment. The table will be fixed and access to ontologies will be resumed as soon as this is resolved. In the interim you can get the obo version of ECO from http://purl.org/obo/obo/ECO.obo On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:08 AM, Erick Antezana wrote: > Hi, > > would it be possible to have the "Ontology table" [1] web page updated > so that it could reflect the fact that there are now 6 OBO foundry > ontologies (in contrast to the candidate ones)? > > BTW, I am getting an error message while trying to download any of > them (http://obo.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/obo/obo/ontology/evidence_code.obo > for instance): > > An Exception Has Occurred > > The root "obo" is unknown. If you believe the value is correct, then > please double-check your configuration. > HTTP Response Status > > 404 Repository not found > > cheers, > Erick > [1] http://www.obofoundry.org/ontologies.shtml > > On 8 March 2010 14:39, Barry Smith <phi...@bu...> wrote: >> At 06:04 AM 3/8/2010, Erick Antezana wrote: >>> Dear Barry, >>> >>> I was wondering about the strategy to keep those first 6 OBO foundry >>> ontologies (and the other ones that will come in the future) within >>> the foundry itself? I mean: is there going to be a regular >>> evaluation >>> (cross-checking) of those ontologies to make sure they *still* >>> comply >>> with the OBO foundry principles? >> >> Indeed. Though we have not worked out the procedures for this. >> >>> On the other hand, in the the URL >>> you'd provided [1], there is an statement that says that those >>> ontologies "have satisfied those principles to an *acceptable* >>> degree"... so does it mean that they actually respect "partially" >>> the >>> principles? and the actions/recommendations list for them is >>> "minimal"? >> >> Yes. Each one of the listed ontologies falls somewhat short of >> perfect compliance as concerns one or other of the criteria applied. >> We continue to work with the developers to ensure that the necessary >> changes are implemented in a step by step fashion. All >> recommendations lists are minimal in the sense that, for every major >> ontology project, it would normally be very easy to produce a long >> list of things which, given unlimited resources, one might improve. >> BS >> >>> regards, >>> Erick >>> [1] >>> http://www.obofoundry.org/wiki/index.php/Announcement_of_First_Set_of_OBO_Foundry_Ontologies >>> >>> On 5 March 2010 21:25, Barry Smith <phi...@bu...> wrote: >>>> >>>> The goal of the OBO Foundry initiative is to create an evolving >>>> group >>>> of biological and biomedical ontologies which will have the >>>> potential >>>> to cover a wide range of life science phenomena in a modular >>>> fashion. >>>> To realize this goal, we have subjected a number of candidate >>>> ontologies to a process of review, the first phase of which has now >>>> been completed. The following ontologies >>>> >>>> CHEBI: Chemical Entities of Biological Interest >>>> GO: Gene Ontology >>>> PATO: Phenotypic Quality Ontology >>>> PRO: Protein Ontology >>>> XAO: Xenopus Anatomy Ontology >>>> ZFA: Zebrafish Anatomy Ontology >>>> >>>> have satisfied the OBO Foundry principles and are recommended as >>>> preferred targets for community convergence. More details >>>> concerning >>>> these recommendations, and also concerning the next steps in the >>>> OBO >>>> Foundry review process, have been published at: >>>> >>>> >>> <http://www.obofoundry.org/wiki/index.php/Announcement_of_First_Set_of_OBO_Foundry_Ontologies >>> >http://www.obofoundry.org/wiki/index.php/Announcement_of_First_Set_of_OBO_Foundry_Ontologies >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Obo-discuss mailing list >>>> Obo...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Obo-discuss mailing list >>> Obo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Obo-discuss mailing list >> Obo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Obo-discuss mailing list > Obo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss > |