Thread: [Objectscript-users] Website problems?
Brought to you by:
rob_d_clark
Menu
▾
▴
objectscript-users
|
From: Arjen <ar...@va...> - 2006-01-10 22:52:41
|
Rob, Is the website (https://objectscript.kicks-ass.org/trac/wiki) down? = I=B4m trying to get the javacc parser part working, but the javacc = results are different than the java files provided in the package of = version 2.10.1. Maybe a version problem. But your website provides = information about how to generate the javacc sources again. I hope it is back up soon. Thanks Arjen |
|
From: Rob C. <ro...@ti...> - 2006-01-10 23:21:53
|
Opps, I forgot to send out an announcement... The website is down temporarily, because I=B9m in the middle of moving. Hopefully it will be bac= k in a week or so. Sorry =8Cbout that. To answer your question, in the toplevel directory of the src tree is a parser.patch file... You need to apply this patch after regenerating the parser... The way I useually do it is: % ./oscript/oscript/build_parser % patch =ADp1 < parser.patch Depending on how much you have changed in the .jj file, the patch usually applies cleanly. But you can send me the output if you have problems, and = I will try to help as best I can. (You'll have to bear with me a bit, becaus= e between work and moving, I have not so much free time... But I'll try to help) On 1/10/06 2:52 PM, "Arjen" <ar...@va...> wrote: > Rob, > =20 > Is the website (https://objectscript.kicks-ass.org/trac/wiki) down? I=B4m t= rying > to get the javacc parser part working, but the javacc results are differe= nt > than the java files provided in the package of version 2.10.1. Maybe a ve= rsion > problem. But your website provides information about how to generate the > javacc sources again. > I hope it is back up soon. > =20 > Thanks > =20 > Arjen >=20 |
|
From: <ar...@va...> - 2006-01-11 07:23:46
|
No problem, thought you might have technical problems. Maybe you can answer already one little question; I don't have this file: oscript/oscript/parser/ASCII_UCodeESC_CharStream.java The only file javaCC generates is the JavaCharStream.java file. Is there = a difference? It is realy difficult to compare the files, because i only have your generated files and those are patched with your patch file. I'm not sure how to verify the generated sources from javacc. One other this is that i can't find the version JTB (JTB 1.2.1) anywhere on the net. The version closest to it is version 1.2.2. I use JavaCC version 4.0. Thanks for your help and good luck with your move Arjen > Opps, I forgot to send out an announcement... The website is down > temporarily, because I=B9m in the middle of moving. Hopefully it will = be > back > in a week or so. Sorry =8Cbout that. > > To answer your question, in the toplevel directory of the src tree is a > parser.patch file... You need to apply this patch after regenerating th= e > parser... The way I useually do it is: > > % ./oscript/oscript/build_parser > % patch =ADp1 < parser.patch > > Depending on how much you have changed in the .jj file, the patch usual= ly > applies cleanly. But you can send me the output if you have problems, = and > I > will try to help as best I can. (You'll have to bear with me a bit, > because > between work and moving, I have not so much free time... But I'll try t= o > help) > > > On 1/10/06 2:52 PM, "Arjen" <ar...@va...> wrote: > >> Rob, >> >> Is the website (https://objectscript.kicks-ass.org/trac/wiki) down? I=B4= m >> trying >> to get the javacc parser part working, but the javacc results are >> different >> than the java files provided in the package of version 2.10.1. Maybe a >> version >> problem. But your website provides information about how to generate t= he >> javacc sources again. >> I hope it is back up soon. >> >> Thanks >> >> Arjen >> > > > |
|
From: <ar...@va...> - 2006-01-11 10:11:48
|
Find the cause of all the problems. I finally were able to get JavaCC 2.0 somewhere from the net. Now the right files are generated. The other problem that i need to get solved is that the patch-file and the files of oscript are created in a unix-like environment. I'm trying to get everything working in Windows. It seems that the patch tool and the patch-file have different file structures like the EOL is different. Your files are all unix-based text files. JavaCC creates the files different i= n Windows. The patch tool can't patch a unix patch-file onto windows based java files :D Will try to solve it all. Hope it works. > No problem, thought you might have technical problems. > > Maybe you can answer already one little question; I don't have this fil= e: > oscript/oscript/parser/ASCII_UCodeESC_CharStream.java > The only file javaCC generates is the JavaCharStream.java file. Is ther= e a > difference? It is realy difficult to compare the files, because i only > have your generated files and those are patched with your patch file. I= 'm > not sure how to verify the generated sources from javacc. > > One other this is that i can't find the version JTB (JTB 1.2.1) anywher= e > on the net. The version closest to it is version 1.2.2. I use JavaCC > version 4.0. > > Thanks for your help and good luck with your move > > Arjen >> Opps, I forgot to send out an announcement... The website is down >> temporarily, because I=B9m in the middle of moving. Hopefully it will= be >> back >> in a week or so. Sorry =8Cbout that. >> >> To answer your question, in the toplevel directory of the src tree is = a >> parser.patch file... You need to apply this patch after regenerating t= he >> parser... The way I useually do it is: >> >> % ./oscript/oscript/build_parser >> % patch =ADp1 < parser.patch >> >> Depending on how much you have changed in the .jj file, the patch >> usually >> applies cleanly. But you can send me the output if you have problems, >> and >> I >> will try to help as best I can. (You'll have to bear with me a bit, >> because >> between work and moving, I have not so much free time... But I'll try = to >> help) >> >> >> On 1/10/06 2:52 PM, "Arjen" <ar...@va...> wrote: >> >>> Rob, >>> >>> Is the website (https://objectscript.kicks-ass.org/trac/wiki) down? I= =B4m >>> trying >>> to get the javacc parser part working, but the javacc results are >>> different >>> than the java files provided in the package of version 2.10.1. Maybe = a >>> version >>> problem. But your website provides information about how to generate >>> the >>> javacc sources again. >>> I hope it is back up soon. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Arjen >>> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Objectscript-users mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectscript-users > > |
|
From: Rob C. <ro...@ti...> - 2006-01-11 16:57:10
|
Hmm, perhaps if you install cygwin, that would include dos2unix and unix2do= s for converting between EOL styles?? Or perhaps the --ignore-whitespace option to patch might help? On 1/11/06 1:58 AM, "ar...@va..." <ar...@va...> wrote: > Find the cause of all the problems. I finally were able to get JavaCC 2.0 > somewhere from the net. Now the right files are generated. The other > problem that i need to get solved is that the patch-file and the files of > oscript are created in a unix-like environment. I'm trying to get > everything working in Windows. It seems that the patch tool and the > patch-file have different file structures like the EOL is different. Your > files are all unix-based text files. JavaCC creates the files different i= n > Windows. The patch tool can't patch a unix patch-file onto windows based > java files :D >=20 > Will try to solve it all. Hope it works. >=20 >> No problem, thought you might have technical problems. >>=20 >> Maybe you can answer already one little question; I don't have this file= : >> oscript/oscript/parser/ASCII_UCodeESC_CharStream.java >> The only file javaCC generates is the JavaCharStream.java file. Is there= a >> difference? It is realy difficult to compare the files, because i only >> have your generated files and those are patched with your patch file. I'= m >> not sure how to verify the generated sources from javacc. >>=20 >> One other this is that i can't find the version JTB (JTB 1.2.1) anywhere >> on the net. The version closest to it is version 1.2.2. I use JavaCC >> version 4.0. >>=20 >> Thanks for your help and good luck with your move >>=20 >> Arjen >>> Opps, I forgot to send out an announcement... The website is down >>> temporarily, because I=B9m in the middle of moving. Hopefully it will be >>> back >>> in a week or so. Sorry =8Cbout that. >>>=20 >>> To answer your question, in the toplevel directory of the src tree is a >>> parser.patch file... You need to apply this patch after regenerating th= e >>> parser... The way I useually do it is: >>>=20 >>> % ./oscript/oscript/build_parser >>> % patch =ADp1 < parser.patch >>>=20 >>> Depending on how much you have changed in the .jj file, the patch >>> usually >>> applies cleanly. But you can send me the output if you have problems, >>> and >>> I >>> will try to help as best I can. (You'll have to bear with me a bit, >>> because >>> between work and moving, I have not so much free time... But I'll try t= o >>> help) >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 1/10/06 2:52 PM, "Arjen" <ar...@va...> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Rob, >>>>=20 >>>> Is the website (https://objectscript.kicks-ass.org/trac/wiki) down? I=B4= m >>>> trying >>>> to get the javacc parser part working, but the javacc results are >>>> different >>>> than the java files provided in the package of version 2.10.1. Maybe a >>>> version >>>> problem. But your website provides information about how to generate >>>> the >>>> javacc sources again. >>>> I hope it is back up soon. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks >>>>=20 >>>> Arjen >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log >> files >> for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes >> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&op=3Dclick >> _______________________________________________ >> Objectscript-users mailing list >> Obj...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectscript-users >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fi= les > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Objectscript-users mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectscript-users |
|
From: Rob C. <ro...@ti...> - 2006-01-11 16:53:05
|
Hmm... I'm not sure which javacc version I have been using, but it is probably much older, which may explain the ASCII_UCodeESC_CharStream.java v= s JavaCharStream.java. Hopefully I will be able to unpack my computer this weekend, in which case I can send you the version of javacc and jtb that I used. On 1/10/06 11:09 PM, "ar...@va..." <ar...@va...= > wrote: > No problem, thought you might have technical problems. >=20 > Maybe you can answer already one little question; I don't have this file: > oscript/oscript/parser/ASCII_UCodeESC_CharStream.java > The only file javaCC generates is the JavaCharStream.java file. Is there = a > difference? It is realy difficult to compare the files, because i only > have your generated files and those are patched with your patch file. I'm > not sure how to verify the generated sources from javacc. >=20 > One other this is that i can't find the version JTB (JTB 1.2.1) anywhere > on the net. The version closest to it is version 1.2.2. I use JavaCC > version 4.0. >=20 > Thanks for your help and good luck with your move >=20 > Arjen >> Opps, I forgot to send out an announcement... The website is down >> temporarily, because I=B9m in the middle of moving. Hopefully it will be >> back >> in a week or so. Sorry =8Cbout that. >>=20 >> To answer your question, in the toplevel directory of the src tree is a >> parser.patch file... You need to apply this patch after regenerating the >> parser... The way I useually do it is: >>=20 >> % ./oscript/oscript/build_parser >> % patch =ADp1 < parser.patch >>=20 >> Depending on how much you have changed in the .jj file, the patch usuall= y >> applies cleanly. But you can send me the output if you have problems, a= nd >> I >> will try to help as best I can. (You'll have to bear with me a bit, >> because >> between work and moving, I have not so much free time... But I'll try to >> help) >>=20 >>=20 >> On 1/10/06 2:52 PM, "Arjen" <ar...@va...> wrote: >>=20 >>> Rob, >>>=20 >>> Is the website (https://objectscript.kicks-ass.org/trac/wiki) down? I=B4m >>> trying >>> to get the javacc parser part working, but the javacc results are >>> different >>> than the java files provided in the package of version 2.10.1. Maybe a >>> version >>> problem. But your website provides information about how to generate th= e >>> javacc sources again. >>> I hope it is back up soon. >>>=20 >>> Thanks >>>=20 >>> Arjen >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X