lack of UnitTest framework
Brought to you by:
rparlett
Menu
▾
▴
#8 lack of UnitTest framework
Accepted
nobody
None
Medium
Defect
2012-04-14
2010-11-05
Anonymous
No
Originally created by: grshiplett
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.setup a UnitTest
2.run
3.teardown
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Run a test suite.
TestRunner goes Green, Yellow or Red. See Sunit for original.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
2.4+ on any OS
What C compiler are you using, and what version?
any gcc or other
Please provide any additional information below.
Icon is even better suited than were the original Smalltalk implementations for SUnit or later Java for JUnit or other XUnit since. Will work on this if so requested. See CurlUnit and RUnit for the expression-based languages at curl.com and rebol.com
View and moderate all "tickets Discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Tickets"
Originally posted by: r.parl... (code.google.com)@gmail.com
Thanks for the suggestion; my apologies for the delay in replying.
I have no plans to write a junit library myself, but would welcome a contribution.
Status: Accepted
View and moderate all "tickets Discussion" comments posted by this user
Mark all as spam, and block user from posting to "Tickets"
Originally posted by: Robin.Ha...@googlemail.com
what about using Autotest? It does not necessarily need any programming language library support. Tests are determined by evaluating return codes or stdout/stderr of the test case program. Other than this it provides test suite support, reports and integrates more or less well with Autoconf/Automake. It's M4 actually...
http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html#Using-Autotest