Yes, it is like:" <extension vendor-name=sunw key=element-inverse
value=dept/>"
----- Original Message -----
From: <tr...@th...>
To: <obj...@so...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 6:59 PM
Subject: RE: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO spec mapping to db tables
> So that would remain vendor specific then?
>
> Travis
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: Stefan Ortmanns <Ste...@gm...>
> Sent: 2002-05-08
> To: obj...@so...
> Subject: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO spec mapping to db tables
>
> > I can't seem to find any information on how JDO is supposed to map
classes
> > and class fields to tables and table columns.
> >
> > Anyone know the answer to this?
> >
> > The XML example in the spec:
> >
>
> Hi ,
>
> as far as i know , the Reference Implementation does not use a RDBMS or a
> Table
> structure to make the objects persistent.
> The reference implementation uses a store on file base.
> But should i err, please inform me.
> As far as i know , the Meta Data for table mapping
> are not specified by the JDO Spec.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan
>
> --
> GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
> http://www.gmx.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so...
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so...
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev
|
