Thread: RE: [OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta
Brought to you by:
thma
From: <tr...@th...> - 2002-06-04 21:28:13
|
+1 for b Travis ---- Original Message ---- From: Thomas Mahler <tho...@ho...> Sent: 2002-06-04 To: Jason van Zyl <jv...@ze...>, ojb <obj...@li...> Subject: [OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta Hi Jason, I fixed all the problems at last and released ojb-0-9 today! So now we can begin our shift to Jakarta. 1. The OJB developer list. below you find a list of our active developers. Please set up CVS on the jakarta servers for all of them. armin_w (armin waibel) arobinson (Andrew Robinson) baserose (Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz) brj (Jakob Braeuchi) ceperez (Carlos E. Perez) cgreenlee (Chris Greenlee) chrath (Christian Rath) dariusschier (Darius Schier) dpeugh (David Dixon-Peugh) florianbruckner (Florian Bruckner) gcole (George Cole) hhoang (Hai Hoang) jvanzyl (Jason van Zyl) mattbaird (Matthew Baird) mpoeschl (Martin Poeschl) neoflux (Matthew Porter) olegnitz (Oleg Nitz) pinkcoder (Angela Robertson) prophecyslides (Travis Reeder) saua (Joachim Sauer) thma (Thomas Mahler) vtx1800 (Dale Davis) The sourceforge account is also the email account (user vtx1800 can be reached by vt...@us...). [I removed two accounts, namely bigrana (Daniele de Petris) garf (Jon Garfunkel) as they have been absent for more than year now. ] 2. Moving of the code This may be a bit tricky as there is permanent activity on our CVS repository. I see two options: a. start to migrate the ojb0.9 state of the repository (marked by a version lable "rel-0-9") to see if everything is OK. If everything is fine we can checking the changes since rel-0-9. This approach will allow developers to checkin stuff while you set up everything in parallel. Disadvantage: getting things in sync will be quite a burden. b. we have to define a frozen zone where no one should checkin stuff into the *old* sf repository. You do the migration of the code. After you have finished this job, everyone is informed to work against the *new* repository. This will reduce migration problems like running out of sync. Disadvantage: the developers can't check in code for some time. (I vote for b. But of course it's up to you.) I hope I did not forget any important issues :-) thanks for your help, Thomas _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
From: Matthew b. <mat...@ya...> - 2002-06-04 22:15:51
|
+1 for b, and maybe do the code beautifier to remove extra lines at the same time :) tr...@th... wrote: +1 for b Travis ---- Original Message ---- From: Thomas Mahler Sent: 2002-06-04 To: Jason van Zyl , ojb Subject: [OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta Hi Jason, I fixed all the problems at last and released ojb-0-9 today! So now we can begin our shift to Jakarta. 1. The OJB developer list. below you find a list of our active developers. Please set up CVS on the jakarta servers for all of them. armin_w (armin waibel) arobinson (Andrew Robinson) baserose (Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz) brj (Jakob Braeuchi) ceperez (Carlos E. Perez) cgreenlee (Chris Greenlee) chrath (Christian Rath) dariusschier (Darius Schier) dpeugh (David Dixon-Peugh) florianbruckner (Florian Bruckner) gcole (George Cole) hhoang (Hai Hoang) jvanzyl (Jason van Zyl) mattbaird (Matthew Baird) mpoeschl (Martin Poeschl) neoflux (Matthew Porter) olegnitz (Oleg Nitz) pinkcoder (Angela Robertson) prophecyslides (Travis Reeder) saua (Joachim Sauer) thma (Thomas Mahler) vtx1800 (Dale Davis) The sourceforge account is also the email account (user vtx1800 can be reached by vt...@us...). [I removed two accounts, namely bigrana (Daniele de Petris) garf (Jon Garfunkel) as they have been absent for more than year now. ] 2. Moving of the code This may be a bit tricky as there is permanent activity on our CVS repository. I see two options: a. start to migrate the ojb0.9 state of the repository (marked by a version lable "rel-0-9") to see if everything is OK. If everything is fine we can checking the changes since rel-0-9. This approach will allow developers to checkin stuff while you set up everything in parallel. Disadvantage: getting things in sync will be quite a burden. b. we have to define a frozen zone where no one should checkin stuff into the *old* sf repository. You do the migration of the code. After you have finished this job, everyone is informed to work against the *new* repository. This will reduce migration problems like running out of sync. Disadvantage: the developers can't check in code for some time. (I vote for b. But of course it's up to you.) I hope I did not forget any important issues :-) thanks for your help, Thomas _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup |
From: Chris G. <CGr...@de...> - 2002-06-05 13:20:42
|
Hear, hear! +1 for b, and please do the code beautifier. :) Cheers, Chris > > +1 for b, and maybe do the code beautifier to remove extra lines at the > same time :) > tr...@th... wrote: +1 for b > > Travis |