Thread: RE: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem?
Brought to you by:
thma
Menu
▾
▴
objectbridge-developers
|
From: Matthew B. <ma...@so...> - 2002-05-26 04:46:59
|
Maybe I should just nuke those old files and check them in as binaries under different names.... -----Original Message----- From: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 9:15 PM To: Matthew E. Porter; obj...@li... Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem? The files are still in text. cvswrappers is a good way to enforce jar files to be binary. It is tricky to change an existing file from jar to binary. Perhaps the easiest is to get the files from the Sun JDO distribution. Dave At 11:06 PM 5/25/2002 -0500, Matthew E. Porter wrote: >I just performed a fresh checkout from cvs and it appears that the jdo.jar >is still not correct. I am receiving complaints about missing classes, >such as javax.jdo.PersistenceManager. If this problem originates from jar >files being checked in as text files, is anyone opposed to setting the >cvswrappers to force all jar files in binary mode. This is probably the >simplest way to enforce this. Or am I doing something wrong that is >causing the system not to build? > > >-matthew porter > > >_______________________________________________________________ > >Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > >_______________________________________________ >Objectbridge-developers mailing list >Obj...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
|
From: <tr...@th...> - 2002-05-26 23:59:21
|
Doh! my bad, sorry guys. Maybe we should just ask sourceforge to delete those files? would that help? Travis ---- Original Message ---- From: "Matthew E. Porter" <ma...@li...> Sent: 2002-05-25 To: obj...@li... Subject: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem? I just performed a fresh checkout from cvs and it appears that the jdo.jar is still not correct. I am receiving complaints about missing classes, such as javax.jdo.PersistenceManager. If this problem originates from jar files being checked in as text files, is anyone opposed to setting the cvswrappers to force all jar files in binary mode. This is probably the simplest way to enforce this. Or am I doing something wrong that is causing the system not to build? -matthew porter _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
|
From: Thomas M. <tho...@ho...> - 2002-05-27 05:16:16
|
Hi Travis, tr...@th... wrote: > Doh! my bad, sorry guys. > > Maybe we should just ask sourceforge to delete those files? would that help? > I don't think this is necessary. It's sufficient to set the binary attribute on those jar with the cvs command line. The problem Matthew E. is reporting here is due to a broken second check-in of those two jars by Matthew Baird. Thomas > Travis > > ---- Original Message ---- > From: "Matthew E. Porter" <ma...@li...> > Sent: 2002-05-25 > To: obj...@li... > Subject: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem? > > I just performed a fresh checkout from cvs and it appears that the > jdo.jar is still not correct. I am receiving complaints about missing > classes, such as javax.jdo.PersistenceManager. If this problem > originates from jar files being checked in as text files, is anyone > opposed to setting the cvswrappers to force all jar files in binary > mode. This is probably the simplest way to enforce this. Or am I doing > something wrong that is causing the system not to build? > > > -matthew porter > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > > > |
|
From: David W F. <dw...@la...> - 2002-05-27 05:20:32
|
I don't believe you can change the existing file type after it is stored. The CVS manual describes the 5-6 step process to correct a file that has been stored in the wrong type. Dave Thomas Mahler writes: > Hi Travis, > > tr...@th... wrote: > > > Doh! my bad, sorry guys. > > > > Maybe we should just ask sourceforge to delete those files? would that help? > > > > > > I don't think this is necessary. It's sufficient to set the binary > attribute on those jar with the cvs command line. > > The problem Matthew E. is reporting here is due to a broken second > check-in of those two jars by Matthew Baird. > > Thomas > > > > Travis > > > > ---- Original Message ---- > > From: "Matthew E. Porter" <ma...@li...> > > Sent: 2002-05-25 > > To: obj...@li... > > Subject: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem? > > > > I just performed a fresh checkout from cvs and it appears that the > > jdo.jar is still not correct. I am receiving complaints about missing > > classes, such as javax.jdo.PersistenceManager. If this problem > > originates from jar files being checked in as text files, is anyone > > opposed to setting the cvswrappers to force all jar files in binary > > mode. This is probably the simplest way to enforce this. Or am I doing > > something wrong that is causing the system not to build? > > > > > > -matthew porter > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > > Obj...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > > Obj...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
|
From: Matthew E. P. <ma...@li...> - 2002-05-26 05:03:20
|
That's is probably the easiest thing to do. I am going to checkin the cvswrappers file that will enforce binary mode for .jar files. -matthew porter On Saturday, May 25, 2002, at 11:47 PM, Matthew Baird wrote: > Maybe I should just nuke those old files and check them in as binaries > under > different names.... > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...] > Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 9:15 PM > To: Matthew E. Porter; obj...@li... > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem? > > The files are still in text. cvswrappers is a good way to enforce jar > files to be binary. It is tricky > to change an existing file from jar to binary. Perhaps the easiest > is to > get the files > from the Sun JDO distribution. > > Dave > At 11:06 PM 5/25/2002 -0500, Matthew E. Porter wrote: >> I just performed a fresh checkout from cvs and it appears that the >> jdo.jar >> is still not correct. I am receiving complaints about missing classes, >> such as javax.jdo.PersistenceManager. If this problem originates from >> jar >> files being checked in as text files, is anyone opposed to setting the >> cvswrappers to force all jar files in binary mode. This is probably >> the >> simplest way to enforce this. Or am I doing something wrong that is >> causing the system not to build? >> >> >> -matthew porter >> >> >> _______________________________________________________________ >> >> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Objectbridge-developers mailing list >> Obj...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X