Thread: RE: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build
Brought to you by:
thma
Menu
▾
▴
objectbridge-developers
|
From: Matthew B. <ma...@so...> - 2002-06-10 05:33:46
|
Man am I bad at CVS. I committed a lot of changes in src, but only added the libs, didn't commit them. Anyone ever use Perforce ;) Don't know about the db-setup.sql, but I don't think you should be using that anymore, use the torque based stuff. I, for one, haven't been keeping my schema up to date in both areas, just the new stuff. See ant prepare-testdb And ant junit2 For the new stuff. m -----Original Message----- From: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...] Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 10:29 PM To: obj...@li... Subject: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build Just updated from CVS but had to add common-beanutils.jar from apache to get the code to compile. Tried to run junit target and the file db-setup.sql had been removed on the update so that it couldn't build junit. Perhaps I'm just looking at this in the middle of an update? Dave _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
|
From: <tr...@th...> - 2002-06-10 06:15:19
|
I have the same problem. ---- Original Message ---- From: David Forslund <dw...@la...> Sent: 2002-06-09 To: obj...@li... Subject: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build Just updated from CVS but had to add common-beanutils.jar from apache to get the code to compile. Tried to run junit target and the file db-setup.sql had been removed on the update so that it couldn't build junit. Perhaps I'm just looking at this in the middle of an update? Dave _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
|
From: Matthew b. <mat...@ya...> - 2002-06-10 06:18:59
|
should be fixed now, do another checkout. tr...@th... wrote: I have the same problem. ---- Original Message ---- From: David Forslund Sent: 2002-06-09 To: obj...@li... Subject: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build Just updated from CVS but had to add common-beanutils.jar from apache to get the code to compile. Tried to run junit target and the file db-setup.sql had been removed on the update so that it couldn't build junit. Perhaps I'm just looking at this in the middle of an update? Dave _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup |
|
From: David F. <dw...@la...> - 2002-06-10 15:41:59
|
The beanutils are their, but the junit target still fails. Junit2 almost works with a failure to find table ELVIS.in the running of test.ojb.odmg.AllTests The test.ojb.broker.AllTests passed as did test.ojb.sodal.AllTests Dave At 11:18 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Matthew baird wrote: >should be fixed now, do another checkout. > > tr...@th... wrote: >I have the same problem. > >---- Original Message ---- >From: David Forslund >Sent: 2002-06-09 >To: obj...@li... >Subject: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build > >Just updated from CVS but had to add common-beanutils.jar from apache to >get the code to compile. >Tried to run junit target and the file db-setup.sql had been removed on the >update so that it couldn't build >junit. > >Perhaps I'm just looking at this in the middle of an update? > >Dave > > > >_______________________________________________________________ > >Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >August 25-28 in Las Vegas - >http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink > >_______________________________________________ >Objectbridge-developers mailing list >Obj...@li...u! rceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > > > > >_______________________________________________________________ > >Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >August 25-28 in Las Vegas - >http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink > >_______________________________________________ >Objectbridge-developers mailing list >Obj...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers > > > >Do You Yahoo!? ><http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl>Sign-up >for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup |
|
From: Thomas M. <tho...@ho...> - 2002-06-10 16:53:14
|
Hi David, The table "ELVIS" is used in a testMethod "testBrokerCrash(). It provokes a crash of the PersistenceBroker by using a non-existing tablename. This testcase should only fail, if no Exception is thrown by the broker! Thomas David Forslund wrote: > The beanutils are their, but the junit target still fails. Junit2 > almost works with a failure to find table ELVIS.in the running of > test.ojb.odmg.AllTests The test.ojb.broker.AllTests passed as did > test.ojb.sodal.AllTests > > Dave > At 11:18 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Matthew baird wrote: > >> should be fixed now, do another checkout. >> >> */tr...@th.../* wrote: >> >> I have the same problem. >> >> ---- Original Message ---- From: David Forslund Sent: 2002-06-09 >> To: obj...@li... Subject: >> [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build >> >> Just updated from CVS but had to add common-beanutils.jar from >> apache to get the code to compile. Tried to run junit target and >> the file db-setup.sql had been removed on the update so that it >> couldn't build junit. >> >> Perhaps I'm just looking at this in the middle of an update? >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________________________ >> >> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >> August 25-28 in Las Vegas - >> http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Objectbridge-developers mailing list >> Obj...@li...u! rceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________________________ >> >> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >> August 25-28 in Las Vegas - >> http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Objectbridge-developers mailing list >> Obj...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers >> >> >> >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Sign-up for Video Highlights >> <http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/en/spl> >> of 2002 FIFA World Cup > |
|
From: Thomas M. <tho...@ho...> - 2002-06-10 20:07:00
|
Hi David, I'm currently checking if there are still pieces of code with incompatible licenses. I found that there is some code in ojb.broker.query that originates from OpenEMed. Namely classes: DBException SearchFilter OJBSearchFilter Do you agree to place those files under the Apache licence? If not, we will have to remove those classes from the OJB codebase. cheers, Thomas |
|
From: David F. <dw...@la...> - 2002-06-10 20:20:36
|
Yes. Our license is already essentially the same as the Apache license. I'm wondering if anyone is actually using this code. We are using it ourselves in our own packages. Thanks, Dave At 10:06 PM 6/10/2002 +0200, Thomas Mahler wrote: >Hi David, > >I'm currently checking if there are still pieces of code with incompatible >licenses. I found that there is some code in ojb.broker.query that >originates from OpenEMed. > >Namely classes: >DBException >SearchFilter >OJBSearchFilter > >Do you agree to place those files under the Apache licence? >If not, we will have to remove those classes from the OJB codebase. > >cheers, > >Thomas |
|
From: Matthew B. <ma...@so...> - 2002-06-10 15:58:05
|
The ELVIS stacktrace is not an error, it's a test of crashing the persistencebroker, so the stacktrace is expected. -----Original Message----- From: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:42 AM To: Matthew baird; tr...@th...; obj...@li... Subject: RE: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build The beanutils are their, but the junit target still fails. Junit2 almost works with a failure to find table ELVIS.in the running of test.ojb.odmg.AllTests The test.ojb.broker.AllTests passed as did test.ojb.sodal.AllTests Dave At 11:18 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Matthew baird wrote: should be fixed now, do another checkout. |
|
From: David F. <dw...@la...> - 2002-06-10 16:02:57
|
But there is a failure reported in the junit2 test. There is a comment in
the stack trace that:
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: count not right, found
<49> should have got <39> This failure is expected if your driver doesn't
support advanced JDBC operations.
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:51)
[junit] at
test.ojb.odmg.ScrollableQueryResultsTest.testGetSomeC(ScrollableQueryResultsTest.java:334)
....
followed by:
[junit] Tests run: 114, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.37 sec
[junit] TEST test.ojb.odmg.AllTests FAILED
Dave
Perhaps this is a fault with hsqldb?
At 08:58 AM 6/10/2002 -0700, Matthew Baird wrote:
>The ELVIS stacktrace is not an error, it's a test of crashing the
>persistencebroker, so the stacktrace is expected.
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...]
>Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:42 AM
>To: Matthew baird; tr...@th...;
>obj...@li...
>Subject: RE: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build
>
>
>
>The beanutils are their, but the junit target still fails. Junit2 almost
>works with a failure to find table ELVIS.in the running of
>test.ojb.odmg.AllTests The test.ojb.broker.AllTests passed as did
>test.ojb.sodal.AllTests
>
>Dave
>At 11:18 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Matthew baird wrote:
>
>
>should be fixed now, do another checkout.
>
|
|
From: Thomas M. <tho...@ho...> - 2002-06-10 17:31:44
|
Hi David, The failure you mention is in "testGetSomeC". "ELVIS" is in "testBrokerCrash", which succeeds. cheers, Thomas David Forslund wrote: > But there is a failure reported in the junit2 test. There is a comment > in the stack trace that: > [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: count not right, found > <49> should have got <39> This failure is expected if your driver > doesn't support advanced JDBC operations. > [junit] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:51) > [junit] at > test.ojb.odmg.ScrollableQueryResultsTest.testGetSomeC(ScrollableQueryResultsTest.java:334) > > .... > followed by: > [junit] Tests run: 114, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.37 sec > [junit] TEST test.ojb.odmg.AllTests FAILED > > Dave > > Perhaps this is a fault with hsqldb? > > > At 08:58 AM 6/10/2002 -0700, Matthew Baird wrote: > >> The ELVIS stacktrace is not an error, it's a test of crashing the >> persistencebroker, so the stacktrace is expected. >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> *From:* David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...] >> *Sent:* Monday, June 10, 2002 8:42 AM >> *To:* Matthew baird; tr...@th...; >> obj...@li... >> *Subject:* RE: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build >> >> >> >> The beanutils are their, but the junit target still fails. Junit2 >> almost works with a failure to find table ELVIS.in the running of >> test.ojb.odmg.AllTests The test.ojb.broker.AllTests passed as did >> test.ojb.sodal.AllTests >> >> Dave >> At 11:18 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Matthew baird wrote: >> >> >> should be fixed now, do another checkout. >> > |
|
From: David W F. <dw...@la...> - 2002-06-11 04:04:34
|
Thanks for the correction., I have a hard time telling, since the output was cluttered with a traceback that was "normal". Dave Thomas Mahler writes: > Hi David, > > The failure you mention is in "testGetSomeC". > "ELVIS" is in "testBrokerCrash", which succeeds. > > cheers, > > Thomas > > David Forslund wrote: > > > But there is a failure reported in the junit2 test. There is a comment > > in the stack trace that: > > [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: count not right, found > > <49> should have got <39> This failure is expected if your driver > > doesn't support advanced JDBC operations. > > [junit] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:51) > > [junit] at > > test.ojb.odmg.ScrollableQueryResultsTest.testGetSomeC(ScrollableQueryResultsTest.java:334) > > > > .... > > followed by: > > [junit] Tests run: 114, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.37 sec > > [junit] TEST test.ojb.odmg.AllTests FAILED > > > > Dave > > > > Perhaps this is a fault with hsqldb? > > > > > > At 08:58 AM 6/10/2002 -0700, Matthew Baird wrote: > > > >> The ELVIS stacktrace is not an error, it's a test of crashing the > >> persistencebroker, so the stacktrace is expected. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> *From:* David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...] > >> *Sent:* Monday, June 10, 2002 8:42 AM > >> *To:* Matthew baird; tr...@th...; > >> obj...@li... > >> *Subject:* RE: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build > >> > >> > >> > >> The beanutils are their, but the junit target still fails. Junit2 > >> almost works with a failure to find table ELVIS.in the running of > >> test.ojb.odmg.AllTests The test.ojb.broker.AllTests passed as did > >> test.ojb.sodal.AllTests > >> > >> Dave > >> At 11:18 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Matthew baird wrote: > >> > >> > >> should be fixed now, do another checkout. > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink > > _______________________________________________ > Objectbridge-developers mailing list > Obj...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |
|
From: Matthew b. <mat...@ya...> - 2002-06-10 17:42:23
|
known to be a failure with HSQLDB. I'm going to make this test run conditionally based on driver support. I'll do that tonight.
David Forslund <dw...@la...> wrote: But there is a failure reported in the junit2 test. There is a comment in the stack trace that:
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: count not right, found <49> should have got <39> This failure is expected if your driver doesn't support advanced JDBC operations.
[junit] at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:51)
[junit] at test.ojb.odmg.ScrollableQueryResultsTest.testGetSomeC(ScrollableQueryResultsTest.java:334)
....
followed by:
[junit] Tests run: 114, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 14.37 sec
[junit] TEST test.ojb.odmg.AllTests FAILED
Dave
Perhaps this is a fault with hsqldb?
At 08:58 AM 6/10/2002 -0700, Matthew Baird wrote:
The ELVIS stacktrace is not an error, it's a test of crashing the persistencebroker, so the stacktrace is expected.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Matthew baird; tr...@th...; obj...@li...
Subject: RE: [OJB-developers] Re: CVS build
The beanutils are their, but the junit target still fails. Junit2 almost works with a failure to find table ELVIS.in the running of
test.ojb.odmg.AllTests The test.ojb.broker.AllTests passed as did test.ojb.sodal.AllTests
Dave
At 11:18 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Matthew baird wrote:
should be fixed now, do another checkout.
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X