Thread: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
Brought to you by:
thma
Menu
▾
▴
objectbridge-developers
|
From: Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...> - 2002-06-06 20:45:56
|
hi ,
i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl and now i get
NPE caused by the statement
logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+" value:"+value);
in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the toString()
implementation of obj.
ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString() fails bcause
allArticlesInGroup() is null.
the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be cleaner to fix
the various toString() in the test objects.
jakob
|
|
From: Leandro R. S. C. <le...@ib...> - 2002-06-06 21:10:28
|
Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due to
SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
Can we work on that ?
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> hi ,
>
> i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl and now i get
> NPE caused by the statement
>
> logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+" value:"+value);
>
> in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the toString()
> implementation of obj.
> ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString() fails bcause
> allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
>
> the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be cleaner to fix
> the various toString() in the test objects.
>
> jakob
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
--
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
|
|
From: Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...> - 2002-06-07 13:30:10
|
hi leandro,
with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment this line.
afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know the reason it
fails now.
jakob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
Cc: <obj...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due to
> SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
>
> My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> Can we work on that ?
>
> On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > hi ,
> >
> > i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl and now i
get
> > NPE caused by the statement
> >
> > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
value:"+value);
> >
> > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the toString()
> > implementation of obj.
> > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString() fails bcause
> > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
> >
> > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be cleaner to
fix
> > the various toString() in the test objects.
> >
> > jakob
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> >
> > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > Obj...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> --
> Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
>
|
|
From: Leandro R. S. C. <le...@ib...> - 2002-06-07 13:48:15
|
I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests before
rel-0-9
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> hi leandro,
>
> with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment this line.
> afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know the reason it
> fails now.
>
> jakob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> Cc: <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
>
>
> > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due to
> > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> >
> > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > Can we work on that ?
> >
> > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > hi ,
> > >
> > > i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl and now i
> get
> > > NPE caused by the statement
> > >
> > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> value:"+value);
> > >
> > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the toString()
> > > implementation of obj.
> > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString() fails bcause
> > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
> > >
> > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be cleaner to
> fix
> > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > >
> > > jakob
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > Obj...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > --
> > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> >
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
--
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
|
|
From: Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...> - 2002-06-07 14:05:03
|
hi leandro,
yes that's the problem, you need to comment the logger line.
yesterday i only loaded your fixes and the tests failed because of this
logger-line ???
jakob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
Cc: <obj...@li...>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
> They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests before
> rel-0-9
>
> On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > hi leandro,
> >
> > with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment this
line.
> > afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know the
reason it
> > fails now.
> >
> > jakob
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> >
> >
> > > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due to
> > > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> > >
> > > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > > Can we work on that ?
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > hi ,
> > > >
> > > > i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl and
now i
> > get
> > > > NPE caused by the statement
> > > >
> > > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> > value:"+value);
> > > >
> > > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the
toString()
> > > > implementation of obj.
> > > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString() fails
bcause
> > > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
> > > >
> > > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be
cleaner to
> > fix
> > > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > > >
> > > > jakob
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > --
> > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> >
> > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > Obj...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> --
> Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
>
>
|
|
From: Leandro R. S. C. <le...@ib...> - 2002-06-07 14:41:20
|
DONE !
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 11:05, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> hi leandro,
>
> yes that's the problem, you need to comment the logger line.
> yesterday i only loaded your fixes and the tests failed because of this
> logger-line ???
>
> jakob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> Cc: <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
>
>
> > I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
> > They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests before
> > rel-0-9
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > hi leandro,
> > >
> > > with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment this
> line.
> > > afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know the
> reason it
> > > fails now.
> > >
> > > jakob
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > > > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due to
> > > > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> > > >
> > > > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > > > Can we work on that ?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > hi ,
> > > > >
> > > > > i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl and
> now i
> > > get
> > > > > NPE caused by the statement
> > > > >
> > > > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> > > value:"+value);
> > > > >
> > > > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the
> toString()
> > > > > implementation of obj.
> > > > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString() fails
> bcause
> > > > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
> > > > >
> > > > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be
> cleaner to
> > > fix
> > > > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > > > >
> > > > > jakob
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > --
> > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > Obj...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > --
> > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> >
> >
--
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
|
|
From: Leandro R. S. C. <le...@ib...> - 2002-06-07 14:58:07
|
Jakob. I checked rel-0-9 out and ran the tests, They failed (see
attachement) and they don't have any changes of mine which were part of
my last commit on his files.
o.b.s.PersistenseBrokerImpl
o.b.m.PersistentField
o.b.m.PersistentFieldDefaltImpl
o.b.m.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.
I'm assuming that this tests are broken as of rel-0-9 and we should fix
them in order to push other changes/bugfixes to the cvs repo !
Does anyone can point out if this tests were broken ?
Is anyone running the tests on a daily basis ?
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 11:05, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> hi leandro,
>
> yes that's the problem, you need to comment the logger line.
> yesterday i only loaded your fixes and the tests failed because of this
> logger-line ???
>
> jakob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> Cc: <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
>
>
> > I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
> > They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests before
> > rel-0-9
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > hi leandro,
> > >
> > > with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment this
> line.
> > > afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know the
> reason it
> > > fails now.
> > >
> > > jakob
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > > > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due to
> > > > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> > > >
> > > > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > > > Can we work on that ?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > hi ,
> > > > >
> > > > > i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl and
> now i
> > > get
> > > > > NPE caused by the statement
> > > > >
> > > > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> > > value:"+value);
> > > > >
> > > > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the
> toString()
> > > > > implementation of obj.
> > > > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString() fails
> bcause
> > > > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
> > > > >
> > > > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be
> cleaner to
> > > fix
> > > > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > > > >
> > > > > jakob
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > --
> > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > Obj...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > --
> > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> >
> >
--
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
|
|
From: Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...> - 2002-06-07 16:06:17
|
hi leandro,
i successfully ran the tests with the current version from cvs (not 0.9):
junit:
[junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 831 msecs
[junit] [DEFAULT] WARN: Please define a public constructor for class
test.ojb.broker.ArticleWithReferenceProxy
[junit] with the following signature: (int, java.lang.String, int, int,
java.lang.String, double, int, int, int, boolean).
[junit] It must initialize the classes persistent attributes. This is
recommended to increase performance but it's not mandatory!
[junit] Tests run: 68, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.642 sec
[junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
[junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.323 sec
[junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 892 msecs
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.638 sec
i do also have no problems running build junit out of the box of rel-0.9:
junit:
[junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 821 msecs
[junit] Tests run: 66, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.148 sec
[junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 942 msecs
[junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.313 sec
[junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
[junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.438 sec
jakob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
Cc: <obj...@li...>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> Jakob. I checked rel-0-9 out and ran the tests, They failed (see
> attachement) and they don't have any changes of mine which were part of
> my last commit on his files.
> o.b.s.PersistenseBrokerImpl
> o.b.m.PersistentField
> o.b.m.PersistentFieldDefaltImpl
> o.b.m.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.
>
> I'm assuming that this tests are broken as of rel-0-9 and we should fix
> them in order to push other changes/bugfixes to the cvs repo !
>
> Does anyone can point out if this tests were broken ?
> Is anyone running the tests on a daily basis ?
>
> On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 11:05, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > hi leandro,
> >
> > yes that's the problem, you need to comment the logger line.
> > yesterday i only loaded your fixes and the tests failed because of this
> > logger-line ???
> >
> > jakob
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> >
> >
> > > I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
> > > They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests before
> > > rel-0-9
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > hi leandro,
> > > >
> > > > with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment this
> > line.
> > > > afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know the
> > reason it
> > > > fails now.
> > > >
> > > > jakob
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > > > > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due
to
> > > > > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> > > > >
> > > > > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > > > > Can we work on that ?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > > hi ,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl
and
> > now i
> > > > get
> > > > > > NPE caused by the statement
> > > > > >
> > > > > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> > > > value:"+value);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the
> > toString()
> > > > > > implementation of obj.
> > > > > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString()
fails
> > bcause
> > > > > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > > > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > > > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be
> > cleaner to
> > > > fix
> > > > > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > jakob
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
Conference
> > > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > >
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > > --
> > > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > --
> > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > >
> > >
> --
> Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
>
|
|
From: Leandro R. S. C. <le...@ib...> - 2002-06-07 17:20:37
|
JVM problem !
on IBM JVM all some tests fail
java -version
java version "1.3.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1)
Classic VM (build 1.3.1, J2RE 1.3.1 IBM build cxia32131-20020410 (JIT
enabled: jitc))
on Backdown JVM all tests pass
java -version
java version "1.3.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS, mixed mode)
Sorry for the incovenient ! I will use blackdown VM to test my changes
and remove any bugs
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 13:11, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> hi leandro,
>
> i successfully ran the tests with the current version from cvs (not 0.9):
>
> junit:
> [junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 831 msecs
> [junit] [DEFAULT] WARN: Please define a public constructor for class
> test.ojb.broker.ArticleWithReferenceProxy
> [junit] with the following signature: (int, java.lang.String, int, int,
> java.lang.String, double, int, int, int, boolean).
> [junit] It must initialize the classes persistent attributes. This is
> recommended to increase performance but it's not mandatory!
> [junit] Tests run: 68, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.642 sec
> [junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
> [junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.323 sec
> [junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 892 msecs
> [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.638 sec
>
> i do also have no problems running build junit out of the box of rel-0.9:
>
> junit:
> [junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 821 msecs
> [junit] Tests run: 66, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.148 sec
> [junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 942 msecs
> [junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.313 sec
> [junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
> [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.438 sec
>
> jakob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> Cc: <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
>
>
> > Jakob. I checked rel-0-9 out and ran the tests, They failed (see
> > attachement) and they don't have any changes of mine which were part of
> > my last commit on his files.
> > o.b.s.PersistenseBrokerImpl
> > o.b.m.PersistentField
> > o.b.m.PersistentFieldDefaltImpl
> > o.b.m.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.
> >
> > I'm assuming that this tests are broken as of rel-0-9 and we should fix
> > them in order to push other changes/bugfixes to the cvs repo !
> >
> > Does anyone can point out if this tests were broken ?
> > Is anyone running the tests on a daily basis ?
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 11:05, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > hi leandro,
> > >
> > > yes that's the problem, you need to comment the logger line.
> > > yesterday i only loaded your fixes and the tests failed because of this
> > > logger-line ???
> > >
> > > jakob
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > >
> > >
> > > > I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
> > > > They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests before
> > > > rel-0-9
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > hi leandro,
> > > > >
> > > > > with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment this
> > > line.
> > > > > afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know the
> > > reason it
> > > > > fails now.
> > > > >
> > > > > jakob
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > > > > > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing due
> to
> > > > > > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > > > > > Can we work on that ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > > > hi ,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i just loaded the newest version of PersistentFieldDefaultImpl
> and
> > > now i
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > NPE caused by the statement
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> > > > > value:"+value);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the
> > > toString()
> > > > > > > implementation of obj.
> > > > > > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString()
> fails
> > > bcause
> > > > > > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > > > > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > > > > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl .
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may be
> > > cleaner to
> > > > > fix
> > > > > > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > jakob
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
> Conference
> > > > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> > > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > --
> > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > >
> > > >
> > --
> > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> >
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
--
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
|
|
From: Thomas M. <tho...@ho...> - 2002-06-09 20:20:26
|
Hi all
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz wrote:
<snip>
> Is anyone running the tests on a daily basis ?
>
Not exactly on a daily basis, but always when I'm working on OJB I first
check out all new stuff from CVS and run the test suite to see if all
is still OK.
I think all developers are responsible to perform this kind of minimal
quality assurance. If you find any failures or errors, try to identify
the cause of the problem and inform the list about the problem.
cheers,
Thomas
|
|
From: Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...> - 2002-06-07 18:05:59
|
hi leandro,
that's interesting. do you know what exactly failed ?
jakob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
Cc: <obj...@li...>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> JVM problem !
>
> on IBM JVM all some tests fail
> java -version
> java version "1.3.1"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1)
> Classic VM (build 1.3.1, J2RE 1.3.1 IBM build cxia32131-20020410 (JIT
> enabled: jitc))
>
> on Backdown JVM all tests pass
> java -version
> java version "1.3.1"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS, mixed mode)
>
> Sorry for the incovenient ! I will use blackdown VM to test my changes
> and remove any bugs
>
> On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 13:11, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > hi leandro,
> >
> > i successfully ran the tests with the current version from cvs (not
0.9):
> >
> > junit:
> > [junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> >
file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 831 msecs
> > [junit] [DEFAULT] WARN: Please define a public constructor for class
> > test.ojb.broker.ArticleWithReferenceProxy
> > [junit] with the following signature: (int, java.lang.String, int,
int,
> > java.lang.String, double, int, int, int, boolean).
> > [junit] It must initialize the classes persistent attributes. This
is
> > recommended to increase performance but it's not mandatory!
> > [junit] Tests run: 68, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.642
sec
> > [junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> >
file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
> > [junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.323
sec
> > [junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> >
file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 892 msecs
> > [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.638
sec
> >
> > i do also have no problems running build junit out of the box of
rel-0.9:
> >
> > junit:
> > [junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 821 msecs
> > [junit] Tests run: 66, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.148
sec
> > [junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 942 msecs
> > [junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.313
sec
> > [junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
> > [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.438
sec
> >
> > jakob
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> >
> >
> > > Jakob. I checked rel-0-9 out and ran the tests, They failed (see
> > > attachement) and they don't have any changes of mine which were part
of
> > > my last commit on his files.
> > > o.b.s.PersistenseBrokerImpl
> > > o.b.m.PersistentField
> > > o.b.m.PersistentFieldDefaltImpl
> > > o.b.m.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.
> > >
> > > I'm assuming that this tests are broken as of rel-0-9 and we should
fix
> > > them in order to push other changes/bugfixes to the cvs repo !
> > >
> > > Does anyone can point out if this tests were broken ?
> > > Is anyone running the tests on a daily basis ?
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 11:05, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > hi leandro,
> > > >
> > > > yes that's the problem, you need to comment the logger line.
> > > > yesterday i only loaded your fixes and the tests failed because of
this
> > > > logger-line ???
> > > >
> > > > jakob
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
> > > > > They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests
before
> > > > > rel-0-9
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > > hi leandro,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment
this
> > > > line.
> > > > > > afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know
the
> > > > reason it
> > > > > > fails now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > jakob
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > > > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > > > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > > > > > > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing
due
> > to
> > > > > > > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > > > > > > Can we work on that ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > > > > hi ,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i just loaded the newest version of
PersistentFieldDefaultImpl
> > and
> > > > now i
> > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > NPE caused by the statement
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> > > > > > value:"+value);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the
> > > > toString()
> > > > > > > > implementation of obj.
> > > > > > > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString()
> > fails
> > > > bcause
> > > > > > > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > > > > > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > > > > > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl
.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may
be
> > > > cleaner to
> > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > jakob
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
> > Conference
> > > > > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> > > > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > > > >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
Conference
> > > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > >
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > > --
> > > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > --
> > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> >
> > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > Obj...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> --
> Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
>
>
|
|
From: Leandro R. S. C. <le...@ib...> - 2002-06-07 18:18:22
|
I really don't . Thats not the first time I have problems with IBM JVM.
Once upon a I was learning mavem and lost a day of work because of IBM
JVM and jikes !
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 15:11, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> hi leandro,
>
> that's interesting. do you know what exactly failed ?
>
> jakob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> Cc: <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
>
>
> > JVM problem !
> >
> > on IBM JVM all some tests fail
> > java -version
> > java version "1.3.1"
> > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1)
> > Classic VM (build 1.3.1, J2RE 1.3.1 IBM build cxia32131-20020410 (JIT
> > enabled: jitc))
> >
> > on Backdown JVM all tests pass
> > java -version
> > java version "1.3.1"
> > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> > Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS)
> > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS, mixed mode)
> >
> > Sorry for the incovenient ! I will use blackdown VM to test my changes
> > and remove any bugs
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 13:11, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > hi leandro,
> > >
> > > i successfully ran the tests with the current version from cvs (not
> 0.9):
> > >
> > > junit:
> > > [junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > >
> file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 831 msecs
> > > [junit] [DEFAULT] WARN: Please define a public constructor for class
> > > test.ojb.broker.ArticleWithReferenceProxy
> > > [junit] with the following signature: (int, java.lang.String, int,
> int,
> > > java.lang.String, double, int, int, int, boolean).
> > > [junit] It must initialize the classes persistent attributes. This
> is
> > > recommended to increase performance but it's not mandatory!
> > > [junit] Tests run: 68, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.642
> sec
> > > [junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > >
> file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
> > > [junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.323
> sec
> > > [junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > >
> file:/D:/Java/eclipse_0602/workspace/ojb-1-0/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 892 msecs
> > > [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.638
> sec
> > >
> > > i do also have no problems running build junit out of the box of
> rel-0.9:
> > >
> > > junit:
> > > [junit] Running test.ojb.broker.AllTests
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > > file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 821 msecs
> > > [junit] Tests run: 66, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.148
> sec
> > > [junit] Running test.ojb.odmg.AllTests
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > > file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 942 msecs
> > > [junit] Tests run: 95, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.313
> sec
> > > [junit] Running test.ojb.soda.AllTests
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties:
> > > file:/D:/Java/Db/ojb-0.9/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
> > > [junit] [BOOT] INFO: loading XML took 861 msecs
> > > [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.438
> sec
> > >
> > > jakob
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:58 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > >
> > >
> > > > Jakob. I checked rel-0-9 out and ran the tests, They failed (see
> > > > attachement) and they don't have any changes of mine which were part
> of
> > > > my last commit on his files.
> > > > o.b.s.PersistenseBrokerImpl
> > > > o.b.m.PersistentField
> > > > o.b.m.PersistentFieldDefaltImpl
> > > > o.b.m.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.
> > > >
> > > > I'm assuming that this tests are broken as of rel-0-9 and we should
> fix
> > > > them in order to push other changes/bugfixes to the cvs repo !
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone can point out if this tests were broken ?
> > > > Is anyone running the tests on a daily basis ?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 11:05, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > hi leandro,
> > > > >
> > > > > yes that's the problem, you need to comment the logger line.
> > > > > yesterday i only loaded your fixes and the tests failed because of
> this
> > > > > logger-line ???
> > > > >
> > > > > jakob
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I checked rel-0-9 and run the tests !
> > > > > > They are failing too ! I dunno what was the state of this tests
> before
> > > > > > rel-0-9
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:30, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > > > hi leandro,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > with the current state of the test objects i prefer to comment
> this
> > > > > line.
> > > > > > > afaik it was no problem before your changes, but i do not know
> the
> > > > > reason it
> > > > > > > fails now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > jakob
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz" <le...@ib...>
> > > > > > > To: "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>
> > > > > > > Cc: <obj...@li...>
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] PersistentFieldDefaultImpl NPE
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi. I believe I was the last one to change this file.
> > > > > > > > When I commited this changes the ant target junit was failing
> due
> > > to
> > > > > > > > SQLExceptions. I can comment this line if you want.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My opinion is that every testcase should be ok at all times !
> > > > > > > > Can we work on that ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:51, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > > > > > > > hi ,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > i just loaded the newest version of
> PersistentFieldDefaultImpl
> > > and
> > > > > now i
> > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > NPE caused by the statement
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > logger.debug("Setting field:"+f.getName()+" in obj:"+obj+"
> > > > > > > value:"+value);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > in method set(obj, value). the npe is mainly caused by the
> > > > > toString()
> > > > > > > > > implementation of obj.
> > > > > > > > > ie. obj is a ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy and toString()
> > > fails
> > > > > bcause
> > > > > > > > > allArticlesInGroup() is null.
> > > > > > > > > the point is that we just try to set allArticlesInGroup for
> > > > > > > > > ProductGroupWithCollectionProxy in PersistenFieldDefaultImpl
> .
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the simplest fix is to comment the logger call. but it may
> be
> > > > > cleaner to
> > > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > the various toString() in the test objects.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > jakob
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> _______________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
> > > Conference
> > > > > > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> > > > > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > > > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > > > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
> Conference
> > > > > > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas --
> > > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > > > > > Obj...@li...
> > > > > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > > > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > > > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > > Obj...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> > --
> > Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
> > IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
> > http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
--
Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz
IT - Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos (IB)
http://www.ibnetwork.com.br
|
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X