objectbridge-developers

[OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta

[Thomas M. <tho...@ho...>]

Hi Jason,

I fixed all the problems at last and released ojb-0-9 today!
So now we can begin our shift to Jakarta.

1. The OJB developer list. below you find a list of our active 
developers. Please set up CVS on the jakarta servers for all of them.

armin_w (armin waibel)
arobinson (Andrew Robinson)
baserose (Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz)
brj (Jakob Braeuchi)
ceperez (Carlos E. Perez)
cgreenlee (Chris Greenlee)
chrath (Christian Rath)
dariusschier (Darius Schier)
dpeugh (David Dixon-Peugh)
florianbruckner (Florian Bruckner)
gcole (George Cole)
hhoang (Hai Hoang)
jvanzyl (Jason van Zyl)
mattbaird (Matthew Baird)
mpoeschl (Martin Poeschl)
neoflux (Matthew Porter)
olegnitz (Oleg Nitz)
pinkcoder (Angela Robertson)
prophecyslides (Travis Reeder)
saua (Joachim Sauer)
thma (Thomas Mahler)
vtx1800 (Dale Davis)

The sourceforge account is also the email account (user vtx1800 can be 
reached by vt...@us...).

[I removed two accounts, namely
    bigrana (Daniele de Petris)
    garf (Jon Garfunkel)
as they have been absent for more than year now. ]

2. Moving of the code
This may be a bit tricky as there is permanent activity on our CVS 
repository.
I see two options:

a. start to migrate the ojb0.9 state of the repository (marked by a 
version lable "rel-0-9") to see if everything is OK.
If everything is fine we can checking the changes since rel-0-9.
This approach will allow developers to checkin stuff while you set up 
everything in parallel. Disadvantage: getting things in sync will be 
quite a burden.

b. we have to define a frozen zone where no one should checkin stuff 
into the *old* sf repository. You do the migration of the code.
After you have finished this job, everyone is informed to work against 
the *new* repository.
This will reduce migration problems like running out of sync.
Disadvantage: the developers can't check in code for some time.

(I vote for b. But of course it's up to you.)

I hope I did not forget any important issues :-)

thanks for your help,

Thomas

[OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta

[Mahler T. <tho...@it...>]

Hi Jason:
 
One more question: shall we do the package renaming *before* you setup up
the new repository?
Or is it better to do it later?
 
cheers,
 
Thomas

[OJB-developers] Re: Shifting to Jakarta

[Jason v. Z. <jv...@ze...>]

> On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 08:38, Mahler Thomas wrote:
> Hi Jason:
>  
> One more question: shall we do the package renaming *before* you setup up
> the new repository?
> Or is it better to do it later?

I can do it once the code is moved. I've got some scripts to handle it.
 
> cheers,
>  
> Thomas
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jv...@ap...

http://tambora.zenplex.org

Re: [OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta

[Jason v. Z. <jv...@ze...>]

On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 16:58, Thomas Mahler wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> I fixed all the problems at last and released ojb-0-9 today!
> So now we can begin our shift to Jakarta.
> 
> 1. The OJB developer list. below you find a list of our active 
> developers. Please set up CVS on the jakarta servers for all of them.
> 
> armin_w (armin waibel)
> arobinson (Andrew Robinson)
> baserose (Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz)
> brj (Jakob Braeuchi)
> ceperez (Carlos E. Perez)
> cgreenlee (Chris Greenlee)
> chrath (Christian Rath)
> dariusschier (Darius Schier)
> dpeugh (David Dixon-Peugh)
> florianbruckner (Florian Bruckner)
> gcole (George Cole)
> hhoang (Hai Hoang)
> jvanzyl (Jason van Zyl)
> mattbaird (Matthew Baird)
> mpoeschl (Martin Poeschl)
> neoflux (Matthew Porter)
> olegnitz (Oleg Nitz)
> pinkcoder (Angela Robertson)
> prophecyslides (Travis Reeder)
> saua (Joachim Sauer)
> thma (Thomas Mahler)
> vtx1800 (Dale Davis)

Looks good. In addition can each of send me the email address you check
if you don't check your sourceforge account.
 
> The sourceforge account is also the email account (user vtx1800 can be 
> reached by vt...@us...).
> 
> [I removed two accounts, namely
>     bigrana (Daniele de Petris)
>     garf (Jon Garfunkel)
> as they have been absent for more than year now. ]
> 
> 2. Moving of the code
> This may be a bit tricky as there is permanent activity on our CVS 
> repository.
> I see two options:
> 
> a. start to migrate the ojb0.9 state of the repository (marked by a 
> version lable "rel-0-9") to see if everything is OK.
> If everything is fine we can checking the changes since rel-0-9.
> This approach will allow developers to checkin stuff while you set up 
> everything in parallel. Disadvantage: getting things in sync will be 
> quite a burden.
> 
> b. we have to define a frozen zone where no one should checkin stuff 
> into the *old* sf repository. You do the migration of the code.
> After you have finished this job, everyone is informed to work against 
> the *new* repository.
> This will reduce migration problems like running out of sync.
> Disadvantage: the developers can't check in code for some time.
> 
> (I vote for b. But of course it's up to you.)

Plan b. is usally better. I will set up all the accounts and wait for
every to receive their initial password. At this point we declare the
repository frozen and I will move the code. I'm not like the sourceforge
admins, I can move the repository and have it up and running in 30
minutes.

> I hope I did not forget any important issues :-)

I think everything is good.

> thanks for your help,

No problem :-)
 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jv...@ap...

http://tambora.zenplex.org

Re: [OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta

[Oleg N. <on...@uk...>]

+1 for b)

e-mail: on...@uk...
I'd like to get cvs e-mail notifications if possible.

Regards,
 Oleg

On Tuesday 04 June 2002 23:58, Thomas Mahler wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I fixed all the problems at last and released ojb-0-9 today!
> So now we can begin our shift to Jakarta.
>
> 1. The OJB developer list. below you find a list of our active
> developers. Please set up CVS on the jakarta servers for all of them.
>
> armin_w (armin waibel)
> arobinson (Andrew Robinson)
> baserose (Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz)
> brj (Jakob Braeuchi)
> ceperez (Carlos E. Perez)
> cgreenlee (Chris Greenlee)
> chrath (Christian Rath)
> dariusschier (Darius Schier)
> dpeugh (David Dixon-Peugh)
> florianbruckner (Florian Bruckner)
> gcole (George Cole)
> hhoang (Hai Hoang)
> jvanzyl (Jason van Zyl)
> mattbaird (Matthew Baird)
> mpoeschl (Martin Poeschl)
> neoflux (Matthew Porter)
> olegnitz (Oleg Nitz)
> pinkcoder (Angela Robertson)
> prophecyslides (Travis Reeder)
> saua (Joachim Sauer)
> thma (Thomas Mahler)
> vtx1800 (Dale Davis)
>
> The sourceforge account is also the email account (user vtx1800 can be
> reached by vt...@us...).
>
> [I removed two accounts, namely
>     bigrana (Daniele de Petris)
>     garf (Jon Garfunkel)
> as they have been absent for more than year now. ]
>
> 2. Moving of the code
> This may be a bit tricky as there is permanent activity on our CVS
> repository.
> I see two options:
>
> a. start to migrate the ojb0.9 state of the repository (marked by a
> version lable "rel-0-9") to see if everything is OK.
> If everything is fine we can checking the changes since rel-0-9.
> This approach will allow developers to checkin stuff while you set up
> everything in parallel. Disadvantage: getting things in sync will be
> quite a burden.
>
> b. we have to define a frozen zone where no one should checkin stuff
> into the *old* sf repository. You do the migration of the code.
> After you have finished this job, everyone is informed to work against
> the *new* repository.
> This will reduce migration problems like running out of sync.
> Disadvantage: the developers can't check in code for some time.
>
> (I vote for b. But of course it's up to you.)
>
> I hope I did not forget any important issues :-)
>
> thanks for your help,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers

Re: [OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta

[Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...>]

hi ,

i vote for b.)

jakob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Mahler" <tho...@ho...>
To: "Jason van Zyl" <jv...@ze...>; "ojb"
<obj...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:58 PM
Subject: [OJB-developers] Shifting to Jakarta


> Hi Jason,
>
> I fixed all the problems at last and released ojb-0-9 today!
> So now we can begin our shift to Jakarta.
>
> 1. The OJB developer list. below you find a list of our active
> developers. Please set up CVS on the jakarta servers for all of them.
>
> armin_w (armin waibel)
> arobinson (Andrew Robinson)
> baserose (Leandro Rodrigo Saad Cruz)
> brj (Jakob Braeuchi)
> ceperez (Carlos E. Perez)
> cgreenlee (Chris Greenlee)
> chrath (Christian Rath)
> dariusschier (Darius Schier)
> dpeugh (David Dixon-Peugh)
> florianbruckner (Florian Bruckner)
> gcole (George Cole)
> hhoang (Hai Hoang)
> jvanzyl (Jason van Zyl)
> mattbaird (Matthew Baird)
> mpoeschl (Martin Poeschl)
> neoflux (Matthew Porter)
> olegnitz (Oleg Nitz)
> pinkcoder (Angela Robertson)
> prophecyslides (Travis Reeder)
> saua (Joachim Sauer)
> thma (Thomas Mahler)
> vtx1800 (Dale Davis)
>
> The sourceforge account is also the email account (user vtx1800 can be
> reached by vt...@us...).
>
> [I removed two accounts, namely
>     bigrana (Daniele de Petris)
>     garf (Jon Garfunkel)
> as they have been absent for more than year now. ]
>
> 2. Moving of the code
> This may be a bit tricky as there is permanent activity on our CVS
> repository.
> I see two options:
>
> a. start to migrate the ojb0.9 state of the repository (marked by a
> version lable "rel-0-9") to see if everything is OK.
> If everything is fine we can checking the changes since rel-0-9.
> This approach will allow developers to checkin stuff while you set up
> everything in parallel. Disadvantage: getting things in sync will be
> quite a burden.
>
> b. we have to define a frozen zone where no one should checkin stuff
> into the *old* sf repository. You do the migration of the code.
> After you have finished this job, everyone is informed to work against
> the *new* repository.
> This will reduce migration problems like running out of sync.
> Disadvantage: the developers can't check in code for some time.
>
> (I vote for b. But of course it's up to you.)
>
> I hope I did not forget any important issues :-)
>
> thanks for your help,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>