RE: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format... again

[Michael A. <ma...@ip...>]

I have been thinking about this lately. From what I gather from looking at
the repository.xml(.dtd), 
it seems that the repository.xml is a little too jdbc (relational) centric.
I believe that in the name
of staying true to the spirit of JDO, we ought to move any store related
data into a properties
file. Just like most of the JDO commercial implementations are doing.

Mike.


-----Original Message-----
From: tr...@th... [mailto:tr...@th...]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:36 PM
To: obj...@so...
Subject: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format... again


Turns out the jdbc information cannot be put in the jdo files because the
extension tag can't be put in the <jdo> or <package> tag so i'm going to use
the repository.xml for that still.

Travis 

_______________________________________________________________

Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
_______________________________________________
Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
Obj...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev