RE: Re: AW: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

[<tr...@th...>]

We're going down the all encompassing jdo file road for now.

Travis

---- Original Message ----
From: Andy Lewis <aj...@as...>
Sent: 2002-05-28
To: obj...@li...
Subject: Re: AW: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

> hi,
>
> Andy Lewis wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> I'm still missing something here - it sounds like everything can be
>> handled in the JDO file, but that it simply becomes very verbose.
>>
>> Is that accurate?
>>
>
>
> I think you are right:
>
> This JDO file must keep all information, currently in the
> repository.xml  file.
> As we are  bound to the JDO extension mechanism this JDO file won't be
> as concise as a repository.xml.
>
> Thomas

ok...so I'd say we go with the JDO file - even though it is not as easy to
read. If that become a huge issue, perhasp someone could through together
an XSLT stylesheet to make it presentable... :)


"The heights of genius are only measurable by the depths of stupidity."



_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
Obj...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev