Re: AW: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

[Andy L. <aj...@as...>]

> hi,
>
> Andy Lewis wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> I'm still missing something here - it sounds like everything can be
>> handled in the JDO file, but that it simply becomes very verbose.
>>
>> Is that accurate?
>>
>
>
> I think you are right:
>
> This JDO file must keep all information, currently in the
> repository.xml  file.
> As we are  bound to the JDO extension mechanism this JDO file won't be
> as concise as a repository.xml.
>
> Thomas

ok...so I'd say we go with the JDO file - even though it is not as easy to
read. If that become a huge issue, perhasp someone could through together
an XSLT stylesheet to make it presentable... :)


"The heights of genius are only measurable by the depths of stupidity."