Re: AW: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

[Andy L. <aj...@as...>]

<snip/>
>
> That's a good point! We started this thread with "Take JDO serious and
> use a *.jdo file as the single point of keeping metadata."
>
> If we take the JDO Spec serious me should stick 100% to the rules,
> everything else just makes no sense!
>
>> What about
>> the option of maintaining a separate file?
>>
>
> That's my original suggestion. Maybe it was not that bad ?
>
> Thomas
>
>
<snip/>

I'm still missing something here - it sounds like everything can be handled
in the JDO file, but that it simply becomes very verbose.

Is that accurate?


"The heights of genius are only measurable by the depths of stupidity."