RE: RE: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

[<tr...@th...>]

Well what I'm saying is that the xml file is still valid against the jdo dtd as key/value pair are optional in the extension tag and we just extended a tag (which is what xml is all about).  So the way we have specified it would not break any implementation and I'm not even sure if it's out of spec because it still conforms.

I started up a topic at jdocentral to get some feedback on this.

If this does break spec, then we could do something like this:

<extension vendor-name="ojb" key="repository" value="repository.xml">

Or something like that anyways.  

Travis

---- Original Message ----
From: Christian Sell <nc-...@ne...>
Sent: 2002-05-27
To: obj...@li...
Subject: RE: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

>Doh!  ;-)
>
>That's not very good.  Although having it the way we 
specified shouldn't harm anything should it?  
>

It wouldnt harm anything except JDO compliance. But as far as 
I remember, that was the whole point, wasn't it? What about 
the option of maintaining a separate file?


>Be a pain to use the key/value pair when having an extension 
like this:
>
> <extension vendor-name="ojb"
>		platform="hsqldb"
>   		jdbc-level="2.0"
>   		driver="org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver"
>   		protocol="jdbc"
>   		subprotocol="hsqldb"
>   		dbalias="../OJB"
>   		username="sa"
>   		password=""
>		/>
>
>Travis
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: Sebastian Kanthak <seb...@mu...>
>Sent: 2002-05-26
>To: obj...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format
>
>Hi Travis,
>
>On Sunday 26 May 2002 02:10, tr...@th... wrote:
>> So for consistency's sake, I propose the new names like so:
>>
>> <extension vendor-name="ojb" table-name="Product"/>
>>
>> <extension vendor-name="ojb" column-name="stock" jdbc-
type="INTEGER"/>
>
>this won't be spec compliant as the DTD definition for 
extension is:
>
><!ELEMENT extension (extension)*>
><!ATTLIST extension vendor-name CDATA #REQUIRED>
><!ATTLIST extension key CDATA #IMPLIED>
><!ATTLIST extension value CDATA #IMPLIED>
>
>so, it would have to be more like this:
>
><extension vendor-name="ojb" key="table-name" 
value="Product"/>
>
>Note, that you can nest extension-elements if this should be 
necessary to 
>match more complex mapping-attributes.
>
>ciao Sebastian
>
>-- 
>Sebastian Kanthak    |    seb...@mu...
>
>_____________________________________________________________
__
>
>Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's 
Conference
>August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- 
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
>_______________________________________________
>Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
>Obj...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-
jdo-dev
>
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________
__
>
>Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's 
Conference
>August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- 
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
>_______________________________________________
>Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
>Obj...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-
jdo-dev

_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
Obj...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev