AW: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

[Mahler T. <tho...@it...>]

Hi Christian,

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Christian Sell [mailto:nc-...@ne...]
> Gesendet: Montag, 27. Mai 2002 09:45
> An: obj...@li...
> Cc: obj...@li...
> Betreff: RE: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format
>=20
>=20
> >Doh!  ;-)
> >
> >That's not very good.  Although having it the way we=20
> specified shouldn't harm anything should it? =20
> >
>=20
> It wouldnt harm anything except JDO compliance. But as far as=20
> I remember, that was the whole point, wasn't it?=20

That's a good point! We started this thread with "Take JDO serious and =
use a
*.jdo file as the single point of keeping metadata."

If we take the JDO Spec serious me should stick 100% to the rules,
everything else just makes no sense!
=20
> What about=20
> the option of maintaining a separate file?
>=20

That's my original suggestion. Maybe it was not that bad ?

Thomas


>=20
> >Be a pain to use the key/value pair when having an extension=20
> like this:
> >
> > <extension vendor-name=3D"ojb"
> >		platform=3D"hsqldb"
> >   		jdbc-level=3D"2.0"
> >   		driver=3D"org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver"
> >   		protocol=3D"jdbc"
> >   		subprotocol=3D"hsqldb"
> >   		dbalias=3D"../OJB"
> >   		username=3D"sa"
> >   		password=3D""
> >		/>
> >
> >Travis
> >
> >---- Original Message ----
> >From: Sebastian Kanthak <seb...@mu...>
> >Sent: 2002-05-26
> >To: obj...@li...
> >Subject: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format
> >
> >Hi Travis,
> >
> >On Sunday 26 May 2002 02:10, tr...@th... wrote:
> >> So for consistency's sake, I propose the new names like so:
> >>
> >> <extension vendor-name=3D"ojb" table-name=3D"Product"/>
> >>
> >> <extension vendor-name=3D"ojb" column-name=3D"stock" jdbc-
> type=3D"INTEGER"/>
> >
> >this won't be spec compliant as the DTD definition for=20
> extension is:
> >
> ><!ELEMENT extension (extension)*>
> ><!ATTLIST extension vendor-name CDATA #REQUIRED>
> ><!ATTLIST extension key CDATA #IMPLIED>
> ><!ATTLIST extension value CDATA #IMPLIED>
> >
> >so, it would have to be more like this:
> >
> ><extension vendor-name=3D"ojb" key=3D"table-name"=20
> value=3D"Product"/>
> >
> >Note, that you can nest extension-elements if this should be=20
> necessary to=20
> >match more complex mapping-attributes.
> >
> >ciao Sebastian
> >
> >--=20
> >Sebastian Kanthak    |    seb...@mu...
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________
> __
> >
> >Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's=20
> Conference
> >August 25-28 in Las Vegas --=20
> http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
> >Obj...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-
> jdo-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________
> __
> >
> >Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's=20
> Conference
> >August 25-28 in Las Vegas --=20
> http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
> >Obj...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-
> jdo-dev
>=20
> _______________________________________________________________
>=20
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- =
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev
>=20