RE: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

[<tr...@th...>]

Ok,

Will use new repository style grammar.

travis

---- Original Message ----
From: Thomas Mahler <tho...@ho...>
Sent: 2002-05-26
To: obj...@li...
Subject: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

Hi Travis

tr...@th... wrote:

 > Thomas,
 >
 > with regards to extension naming, i'm thinking that using the ojb
 > repository naming conventions like table vs. table-name won't
 > really match, because you also have column.name and jdbc_type which
 >  seems a little inconsistent.
 >
You are referring to the *OLD* repository grammar.
I was talking about the *new* grammar. (See attached dtd-file)
I'm currently patching OJB to use this new grammar!

This file contains the new grammar hopefully free of any syntactic 
inconsistencies.

I strongly recommend to use atribute-names from this grammar like:

<extension vendor-name="ojb" table="Product"/>
<extension vendor-name="ojb" column="stock" jdbc-type="INTEGER"/>

cheers,

Thomas

 > So for consistency's sake, I propose the new names like so:
 >
 > <extension vendor-name="ojb" table-name="Product"/>
 >
 > <extension vendor-name="ojb" column-name="stock"
 > jdbc-type="INTEGER"/>
 >
 > It's more descriptive and matches the jdo naming conventions.
 >
 > Travis
 >
 > _______________________________________________________________
 >
 > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August
 >  25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
 >
 > _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-jdo-dev
 >  mailing list Obj...@li... 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev
 >

 >
 >
 >
 >