Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension format

[Sebastian K. <seb...@mu...>]

Hi Travis,

On Sunday 26 May 2002 02:10, tr...@th... wrote:
> So for consistency's sake, I propose the new names like so:
>
> <extension vendor-name="ojb" table-name="Product"/>
>
> <extension vendor-name="ojb" column-name="stock" jdbc-type="INTEGER"/>

this won't be spec compliant as the DTD definition for extension is:

<!ELEMENT extension (extension)*>
<!ATTLIST extension vendor-name CDATA #REQUIRED>
<!ATTLIST extension key CDATA #IMPLIED>
<!ATTLIST extension value CDATA #IMPLIED>

so, it would have to be more like this:

<extension vendor-name="ojb" key="table-name" value="Product"/>

Note, that you can nest extension-elements if this should be necessary to 
match more complex mapping-attributes.

ciao Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian Kanthak    |    seb...@mu...