Re: AW: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] jdo extension

[Thomas M. <tho...@ho...>]

Hi Christian,

Christian Sell wrote:

<snip>
> 
> I disagree. A database is a resource that must not be taken 
> lightly, as it has the strongest performance implications if 
> treated wrongly. Luring people into the illusion that they 
> can do away with it by the push of a button has the potential 
> of generating disappointments. 
> IMO, a good O/R framework must either exploit or allow easy 
> access to the full capabilities of the underlying DBMS. And 
> in a corporate production scenario, you will almost always 
> have to map your objects to a pre-existing schema.
> 


I absolutely agree with you!

That's why I was so sceptic about the *.JDO idea.

That's why I said: the OJB DescriptorRepository must be the guide line!
But if we can have all necessary information in a *.jdo file I see no 
problems in generating the DescriptorRepository from it.

cheers,


Thomas