RE: Re: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO implementation
Brought to you by:
thma
From: <tr...@th...> - 2002-05-17 01:09:13
|
I made a tutorial3a package that has the Product that does NOT implement PersistenceCapable. Modified build.xml to enhance Product after compilation. And it all works just fine. Nothing broken. Travis ---- Original Message ---- From: Sebastian Kanthak <seb...@mu...> Sent: 2002-05-16 To: obj...@so... Subject: Re: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO implementation Hi Travis, On Wednesday 15 May 2002 19:07, you wrote: > I would like to turn it into a complete JDO implementation and hopefully it > will in time. Any helpers? As for the enhancers, let me put it this way, > it won't break anything. ;-) I don't think, you are right regarding enhancers. Enhanced classes delegate a lot of work to the state manager (for example field access and status interrogation). So if a state manager is not present, it should not work. ciao Sebastian -- Sebastian Kanthak | seb...@mu... _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev |