RE: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO implementation

[<tr...@th...>]

You're completely correct.  What I have going so far is very minimal, just to get it working and usable.  The main point right now is that you can use the JDO api.  

I would like to turn it into a complete JDO implementation and hopefully it will in time.  Any helpers?  As for the enhancers, let me put it this way, it won't break anything.  ;-)

Travis

---- Original Message ----
From: Sebastian Kanthak <seb...@mu...>
Sent: 2002-05-15
To: obj...@so...
Subject: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO implementation

Hi Travis,

On Tuesday 14 May 2002 20:09, tr...@th... wrote:
> Please try it and let me know if you have any troubles.  thanks.

I've taken a look at your source code, but did not have time to try it out. 
However, I have the following question: It seems to me, that you don't have 
implemented StateManager for example, so I'm wondering if your implementation 
is able to work with classes, enhanced by (for example) the reference 
enhancer?

As far as I can see, you are doing more or less an implementation, that 
replaces the OJB-API (PersistenceBroker and so on) via the JDO-API. However, 
that's only a small part of JDO. More important in my opinion, is the way 
PersistenceCapable and StateManager to allow lazy instantiation and all the 
different life-cycle states. Are you planning to work into this direction or 
do you merely want OJB with an JDO-like interface?

Of course, I'm aware, that your project is at the very beginning, so don't 
take it as a critic. I'm only interessted in the way you want to go.

ciao Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian Kanthak    |    seb...@mu...

_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so...
_______________________________________________
Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
Obj...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev