Re: AW: AW: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] Introduction

[Thomas M. <tho...@ho...>]

Hi Joel, Hi Andy,

Joel Shellman wrote:

 > On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 06:48, Andy Lewis wrote:
 >
 >>Ok...so is this, as it appears to be, a cross-community consensus that:
 >>
 >>- Sparrow will focus on JDO with a pluggable architecture
 >>- ORB will focus on a clean, core O/R engine
 >>


I agree !


 >>Implying further that:
 >>
 >>- Both communities have a vested interest in getting the Sparrow JDO 
front
 >>end working on the ORB kernel
 >>- Each project will effectively "endorse" the other
 >>- People will be encouraged to contribute to both efforts when possible
 >>- Sparrow become the JDO interface to ORB
 >>- ORB becomes the "default" plug-in back end for Sparrow
 >>
 >>Tell me if I have asserted facts not in evidence here....
 >>
 >


I agree !


 > Sounds accurate. If all is agreed, I will make appropriate changes to
 > the Sparrow summary verbage on Sourceforge to reflect the slight change
 > of focus, and we should probably carry out discussions of the JDO
 > architecture and store interface on the sparrow-devel discussion list.
 >
 > I will try to come up to speed on PersistenceBroker as soon as possible
 > and if it fits well for my current effort, I may go ahead and integrate
 > it with my current code as I think it may have things that would save me
 > work anyway.
 >


just drop me a line if you have any questions.

cu,

Thomas


 > Thanks!
 >
 > -joel
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Objectbridge-jdo-dev mailing list
 > Obj...@li...
 > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-jdo-dev
 >
 >
 >
 >