Re: AW: AW: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] Introduction
Brought to you by:
thma
From: Joel S. <jo...@ik...> - 2002-04-12 16:50:19
|
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 06:48, Andy Lewis wrote: > Ok...so is this, as it appears to be, a cross-community consensus that: > > - Sparrow will focus on JDO with a pluggable architecture > - ORB will focus on a clean, core O/R engine > > Implying further that: > > - Both communities have a vested interest in getting the Sparrow JDO front > end working on the ORB kernel > - Each project will effectively "endorse" the other > - People will be encouraged to contribute to both efforts when possible > - Sparrow become the JDO interface to ORB > - ORB becomes the "default" plug-in back end for Sparrow > > Tell me if I have asserted facts not in evidence here.... Sounds accurate. If all is agreed, I will make appropriate changes to the Sparrow summary verbage on Sourceforge to reflect the slight change of focus, and we should probably carry out discussions of the JDO architecture and store interface on the sparrow-devel discussion list. I will try to come up to speed on PersistenceBroker as soon as possible and if it fits well for my current effort, I may go ahead and integrate it with my current code as I think it may have things that would save me work anyway. Thanks! -joel |