AW: AW: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] Introduction

[Mahler T. <tho...@it...>]

Hi Joel, Hi Andy,

> I would like to second your suggestion that Sparrow do #1 
> because... #3
> might not be part of the Sparrow project after all. For example, I
> mentioned Ozone. Sparrow could be the front JDO with pluggable stores
> architecture, and Ozone or other object databases could then do their
> own work to conform to that pluggable architecture.
>
excluding #3 from the Sparrow scope will be the best solution to get
Sparrow started as fast as possible.
 
> Thus... let's call Sparrow the front end JDO architecture and if I
> decide to do a new optimized object storage for it (which I 
> would really
> like to but don't know if I'll have time), that could be the third
> project.
> 
> How does that sound?

For me it's definitely OK! 

So when will you have finished #1? ;-)

cu,

Thomas
 
> -- 
> Joel Shellman
> Comprehensive Internet Solutions -- Building business dreams.
> [ web design | database | e-commerce | hosting | marketing ]
> iKestrel, Inc.  http://www.ikestrel.com/
>