Re: AW: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] Introduction

[Andy L. <aj...@as...>]

> I apologize for being quiet for a few days. "Real life" got a little
> crazy.

understood...


> Agreed. And that will be a project goal--that "pluggable stores" will
> be able to easily evolve separate of the front end JDO impl. I do want
> to keep things open for optimizations though. There may be situations
> where we specific stores might want to override certain classes or
> something to make things extremely fast/optimized. This can be designed
> in as we go along, though and is optional.
>
> I guess what I'm trying to say is an elegant modular architecture with
> support for a "fasttrack" pipeline for optimized stores.
>
> Modularity is great... but especially for my vision of a JDO object
> store, I would really like it to scream.

absolutely...

> Thus... let's call Sparrow the front end JDO architecture and if I
> decide to do a new optimized object storage for it (which I would
> really like to but don't know if I'll have time), that could be the
> third project.
>
> How does that sound?

sounds fine to me...and sort of invalidates some of the following parts of
the thread....





"The heights of genius are only measurable by the depths of stupidity."