AW: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO

[Mahler T. <tho...@it...>]

Hi Juozas,
=20
This is a known Problem. I guess Sun still maintains the old IP-Filters =
from
the COCOM era!
I think JDO will have an enourmous influence in the field of Java
Persistence.
You should not feel discouraged by this restriction.
Just contact the JDO people directly via mail and ask if they can =
provide
you with the JDO RI sources.
=20
Thomas
=20
=20

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:ba...@ce...]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. M=E4rz 2002 23:43
An: Juozas Baliuka; obj...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO


Sorry,
I tried to download RI from SUN, but it says Lithuanians are enemies =
for
SUN.
JDO is not interesting for anymore.

Countries Authorized to Receive Source Code =09
  =09


*	Australia=20

*	Austria=20

*	Belgium=20

*	Brazil=20

*	British Virgin Islands=20

*	Canada=20

*	Colombia=20

*	Czech Republic=20

*	Denmark=20

*	Dominican Republic=20

*	Egypt=20

*	Finland=20

*	France=20

*	Germany=20

*	Greece=20

*	Hong Kong=20

*	Hungary=20

*	Iceland=20

*	India=20

*	Ireland=20

*	Israel=20

*	Italy=20

*	Japan=20

*	Korea, South=20

*	Luxembourg=20

*	Malaysia=20

*	Mexico=20

*	Netherlands=20

*	New Zealand=20

*	Norway=20

*	Panama=20

*	Philippines=20

*	Portugal=20

*	Singapore=20

*	Slovak Republic=20

*	South Africa=20

*	Spain=20

*	St. Kitts & Nevis=20

*	Sweden=20

*	Switzerland=20

*	Taiwan=20

*	United Kingdom=20

*	United States=20

*	Uruguay=20

*	Venezuela=20


=20

----- Original Message -----=20
From: Juozas  <mailto:ba...@ce...> Baliuka=20
To: obj...@li...
<mailto:obj...@li...> =20
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:27 PM
Subject: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] JDO

Hi,
It is good idea to implement JDO.
I use ObjectBridge in my project and want to contribute.
Is some coding started ? I don't see it in CVS.
I have some expirence in persitence and some with JDO .