AW: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] Intermediate results

[Mahler T. <tho...@it...>]

Hi Frido,

that's great! I loaded your model with the just released Poseidon 1.1 =
CE
without problems.
I intend to have more and more OJB details modeled in Argo/Poseidon CE.

I will setup a CVS soon to have this model shared.=20
I suggest to keep not everything in one model but to have (say) one =
.zargo
per package.
The reason: .zargo can only be handled as a monolithic binary file by =
CVS.
Thus concurrent edits are very difficult to maintain. What do you =
think?

I've a question how to use Poseidon diagrams with html (or xml)
documentation: Until now I simply exported  GIF or PNG files that have =
to be
kept up to date manually :-(
Is there a way to do this automatically or to have some kind of =
hyperlink
mechanism from the HTML document into the Poseidon model?

Another question: how to keep the model in sync with the code? I know =
Argo
supports reverse engineering, but does it help to show diffs?=20


Thanks for your efforts,

Thomas

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Budde, Frido [mailto:fri...@vi...]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Januar 2002 12:48
> An: 'obj...@li... '
> Betreff: [Objectbridge-jdo-dev] Intermediate results
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
> thought you might want to have a look at some of my intermediate
> documentation results. It's neither complete nor do I claim=20
> correctness but
> nevertheless it might help to understand the way OJB works.=20
> I'll try to add
> more details in the near future. The most interesting part of=20
> the model at
> present is the interaction diagram describing how a newly=20
> persisted object
> is written to the database.
>=20
> I forgot: It's a uml model created with the community edition=20
> of poseidon (a
> commercial version of argo created by www.gentleware.com).
>=20
> I'd appreciate any comments on the model. Thanks in advance.
>=20
> Frido
>=20
> Thomas: Could you set up a cvs repository so I'd be able to=20
> check in updates
> of the documentation instead of posting it to the newsgroup?
>=20
>=20