AW: [OJB-developers] RE: migration to jakarta
Brought to you by:
thma
From: Mahler T. <tho...@it...> - 2002-06-18 07:12:36
|
Hi all, I suggest we take this opportunity to change the test package names to org.apache.ojb.* as Chris suggested some time ago. This will allow us to perform white box testing by accessing package scope attributes and methods. See Chris original message and my reply below: Thomas > Chris Greenlee wrote: > > +1. I like the idea of using the WebShop classes as a basis. > > > > When/while we do this, would it be a good idea to start > moving tests from > > the test.ojb package into the ojb package? That way we can > include tests of > > protected methods where useful. > > > > Good idea. There is only one caveat: > currently all compiled classes are written to target/classes. > Once we put test classes into the same packages as the production > classes we have compile them into different subdirectories say: > target/classes/production > target/classes/test > > so we can avoid to include test classes into the binary distribution > ojb-xxx.jar > > Thomas > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris Greenlee |