Re: [OJB-developers] Re: MtoN-followup

[Georg S. <ge...@me...>]

Hi Oleg,

You mean you would construct a CollectionDescriptor for the N-side and not
add it to the ClassDescriptor of the N-side?

Cheers

Georg

On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Oleg Nitz wrote:

> Hi Jacob and Georg,
>
> It is convenient to have bidirectional relationship for OJB internals
> (this makes things more uniform and simple),
> but it may be inconvenient for user.
> I propose the following trick: if there is no inverse relationship we
> generate it automatically. We may even allow user to use it in query
> conditions. For example "~rel" would mean inverse relation for "rel".
> What do you think?
>
> Oleg
>
> Georg Schneider wrote:
> > Hi jacob,
>
> > Could you give me the basic reason for that requirement or please point me
> > to your discussion with Oleg (I missed that one :-) ).
> > Nevertheless I think that this is quite a big intrusion into the java code
> > and since all of the information needed is already in the
> > CollectionDescriptor of the M-side, I don't see a reason for doing it.
>
> > Cheers
>
> > Georg
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________________________
>
> > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> > Obj...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>