Re: [OJB-developers] Re: MtoN-followup

[Oleg N. <on...@ib...>]

Hi Jacob and Georg,

It is convenient to have bidirectional relationship for OJB internals
(this makes things more uniform and simple),
but it may be inconvenient for user.
I propose the following trick: if there is no inverse relationship we
generate it automatically. We may even allow user to use it in query
conditions. For example "~rel" would mean inverse relation for "rel".
What do you think?

Oleg

Georg Schneider wrote:
> Hi jacob,

> Could you give me the basic reason for that requirement or please point me
> to your discussion with Oleg (I missed that one :-) ).
> Nevertheless I think that this is quite a big intrusion into the java code
> and since all of the information needed is already in the
> CollectionDescriptor of the M-side, I don't see a reason for doing it.

> Cheers

> Georg



> _______________________________________________________________

> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers