RE: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem?
Brought to you by:
thma
From: Matthew B. <ma...@so...> - 2002-05-26 04:46:59
|
Maybe I should just nuke those old files and check them in as binaries under different names.... -----Original Message----- From: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 9:15 PM To: Matthew E. Porter; obj...@li... Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] Fresh Checkout - JDO Problem? The files are still in text. cvswrappers is a good way to enforce jar files to be binary. It is tricky to change an existing file from jar to binary. Perhaps the easiest is to get the files from the Sun JDO distribution. Dave At 11:06 PM 5/25/2002 -0500, Matthew E. Porter wrote: >I just performed a fresh checkout from cvs and it appears that the jdo.jar >is still not correct. I am receiving complaints about missing classes, >such as javax.jdo.PersistenceManager. If this problem originates from jar >files being checked in as text files, is anyone opposed to setting the >cvswrappers to force all jar files in binary mode. This is probably the >simplest way to enforce this. Or am I doing something wrong that is >causing the system not to build? > > >-matthew porter > > >_______________________________________________________________ > >Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference >August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > >_______________________________________________ >Objectbridge-developers mailing list >Obj...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Objectbridge-developers mailing list Obj...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers |