Re: [OJB-developers] bad checkin?

[Thomas M. <tho...@ho...>]

Hi Jakob,

Jakob Braeuchi wrote:

> hi thomas,
> 
> i'm really sorry if i messed up the tags. i synched with the repository and
> had a mismatch between tags in dtd and in RepositoryTags,
> so i 'fixed' it. now i know what the problem was: the
> jdbc-connection-descriptors of all but hsqldb still use the old tags :(
> 


That was my fault ! I changed the default entry only. There is now all 
this new Maven stuff with variables like "@DBMS_NAME@". It assumed this 
is working for all platforms now ?!

sorry from my side too!

Thomas


> sorry
> jakob
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Mahler" <tho...@ho...>
> To: "Matthew Baird" <ma...@so...>
> Cc: <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 5:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] bad checkin?
> 
> 
> 
>>Hi Matthew, hi Jakob,
>>
>>Matthew Baird wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like someone forgot to checkin some conversions stuff in metadata
>> > package. Please fix (you know who you are ;))
>> > Hi Matthew, hi Jakob,
>>
>>
>>Mhh, I just checked my changes with the CVS on SF. All my recent changes
>>are there!
>>
>>I changed the conversion stuff as follows: conversions are no longer
>>defined per class but per attribute. This allows to reuse predefined
>>conversions much better.
>>
>>There is also a new package ojb.broker.accesslayer.conversions
>>containing the new stuff.
>>
>>I also checked in all necessary changes to the metadata layer and to the
>>repository.dtd. (I did *not* change the new ContentHandler stuff to
>>reflect the new grammar.)
>>
>>Unfortunately Jakob overwrote my changes to RepositoryTags.java.
>>  But my changes are in sync with the new repository grammar! SO I will
>>check them in again.
>>
>>I started with the long awaited clean-up of the repository grammar.
>>There will come more changes to the grammar in the next days!
>>This may cause some inconvienience, but we will be rewarded with a much
>>more homogenous and readable repository grammar.
>>
>>cu,
>>
>>Thomas
>>
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> > m
>> > > _______________________________________________________________
>> > Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
>> > Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
>> > Obj...@li...
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>> > > > >
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________
>>Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
>>Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Objectbridge-developers mailing list
>>Obj...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>>
>>
> 
> 
>