Re: [OJB-developers] bug in CollectionProxy

[Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...>]

hi georg,

this is a pre-factory relict !
the bug is now corrected in cvs.

jakob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Georg Schneider" <ge...@me...>
To: "Mahler Thomas" <tho...@it...>;
<obj...@li...>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 6:51 PM
Subject: [OJB-developers] bug in CollectionProxy


> Hi Thomas,
>
> CollectionProxy takes in a PersistenceBroker when being constructed, which
> isn't actually necessary, because a new one is requested from the factory
> if the field is null. The problem is that in PersistenceBrokerImpl the
> this-pointer is handed over at construction time:
>
> if (lazy)
> return new CollectionProxy(collectionClass, this, query);
>
> which means that one Broker-Instance is now available at different places
> and screws up things badly.
>
> Since it isn't necessary (see above) I just commented out the following
> line in the CollectionProxy-Constructor:
>
> public CollectionProxy(Class aCollClass, PersistenceBroker
> aBroker, Query aQuery)
>
> {
> setCollectionClass(aCollClass);
> //setBroker(aBroker);
> setQuery(aQuery);
> calculateSize();
> }
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Georg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>