Re: [OJB-developers] Bug with PersistentFieldPropertyImpl

[Thomas M. <tho...@ho...>]

Hi Matthew,

Matthew Baird wrote:

> I use the PersistentFieldPropertyImpl to map my attributes using the
> javabean format of getXXX and setXXX.
> 
> When I try to use this in ODMG, OJB dies because a lot of the DCollection
> classes don't have public getters and setters for attributes that are mapped
> (mostly Id, size, elements, stuff like that). Can we make those methods
> public so that it all works nicely? Or is there a reason they were default
> scope?


The only reason to "hide" these methods from users is to hide 
implementation details.
But there is no deeper reason apart from that.

IMHO we should make them public to provide full Support for the 
PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.

cu,

Thomas


> 
> regards,
> Matthew
> 
> btw -> I'm just squashing one last bug with JCA connection closing then I'll
> post a new JCA implementation (soon to be blessed by Jesper)
> 


I'm planning to have OJB 1.0 (or at least a RC) released in June. It 
would be great to have the JCA stuff included then!

cheers,

Thomas


> 
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> 
> 
> 
>