Re: [OJB-developers] Warning on Oracle

[Jakob B. <jbr...@ho...>]

hi eric,

i agree.
the warning about the missing constructor "[DEFAULT] WARN: Please define a
public constructor for class ..."
should also be changed to INFO.

jakob


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Bieschke" <EBi...@sa...>
To: <obj...@li...>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] Warning on Oracle


> Given the amount of confusion over this WARNing, and the fact that this
> behavior is expected and not problematic; I'd vote for this message to log
> at level INFO rather than WARN.
>
> -- Eric Bieschke
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Sean Taylor <da...@bl...>
> To: <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:16 AM
> Subject: [OJB-developers] Warning on Oracle
>
>
> Why do I get these messages?
> What kind of problems are there with Oracle8i....
>
> WARN: problems with platform ojb.broker.platforms.Platform
> Oracle8iImpl: ojb.broker.platforms.PlatformOracle8iImpl
> WARN: OJB will use PlatformDefaultImpl instead
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>