AW: Antwort: Re: [OJB-developers] JUnit Tests & MySQL / global ID s

[Mahler T. <tho...@it...>]

Hi Joachim,

<snip> 
> Ok, now it's done. It's configurable by setting 
> SequenceManagerGlobalIDs to
> true/false. The default-setting (old-style, per-class IDs) will stay,
> unless explicitely reconfigured.
> 

Fine !

> It got a little bit of documentation in OJB.properties. I 
> think I'll add
> some more documentation in the "true" documentation (as soon 
> as I find the
> correct place for it).
> 

there is a document on the OJB.properties file in
src/doc/system/ojb-properties.html

> >>> The function is not yet configurable (except for setting
> >>> globalSequence = true in the constructor and recompiling), as I
> >>> don't to wait for the rewrite of BaseConfiguration (which I would
> >>> volunteer to do, if no-one has started work on it yet, maybe if
> >>> anyone has any design ideas. If not, I'll just do it how I see fit
> >>> ;-)
> >>
> >>
> >> I think that no one has started on the refactoring of the
> >> Configuration stuff. So you can just give it a try.
> >
> > OK, I'll try this. My idea is to unite Type-Conversion and
> > Default-Values so that an incorrect entry could result in a good
> > log-entry and the default value beeing used. something like
> > getBoolean("someConfiguration", true) and
> > getInteger("someConfiguration", 42) and so on.
> 
> Done & checked in. Basically you now have the ability to do a 
> getString,
> getBoolean, getInteger with default values. Additionally there's a
> getClass-Function, that can even check, wether the specified class
> implements/extends the correct Interface/Baseclass. And 
> getStrings() is
> just the next-generation parseSeperatedString(). Right now only
> PersitenceBrokerFactoryConfiguration and 
> SequenceManagerHighLowImpl use
> these functions. I'm pretty sure that some of
> PersistenceBrokerFactoryConfigurations getter-methods can be 
> made obsolete
> by doing direct get<type>-access in the plugabble classes (like
> getSequenceManagerGrabSize()).
> 

I will have a look at this issue !

Thanks for your efforts,

Thomas

> regards
> Joachim Sauer
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
>