Re: [OJB-developers] HSQLDB performance also bad

[Jon B. <jon...@ac...>]

Well, I did have JBuilder 4 running at the time, which I killed and then 
re-ran the tests.  Shaved about .5 of a second off the total :-)

I can't understand why your tests take so long - the hardware 
architecture is not *that* different, and having 2 CPUs instead of 1 
doesn't make a vast difference.

Jon.

Ricardo Argüello wrote:
> Thomas,
> 
> How could you get faster results than our "twin xeon" friend here!?!
> 
> Thomas:
> [ojb] 17.435
> [jdbc] 12.065
> 
> Jon Barber:
> [ojb] 96.75
> [jdbc] 65.781
> 
> 
> Definitely, something is wrong with your tests.
> When I ran my tests, NO other process where running, no antivirus, no M$ Messenger, nothing but OJB...
> 
> 
> Ricardo
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jon Barber" <jon...@ac...>
> To: "Ricardo Argüello" <ri...@ya...>
> Cc: "Thomas Mahler" <tho...@ho...>; "Jakob Braeuchi" <jbr...@ho...>; "objectbridge" <obj...@li...>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] HSQLDB performance also bad
> 
> 
> 
>>OK, for the record, my times from 'build performance' is
>>
>>ojb : 96.75
>>jdbc : 65.781
>>
>>This was on HSQL on a twin Intel XEON 1.4Ghz box with 512Mb Win 2000 SP2
>>Sun JDK 1.3.1_01.
>>
>>I also tried against the PointBase java db running in server mode and 
>>got slightly worse performance (in the order of about 1 second slower in 
>>total).
>>
>>I'd love to try the same test through Castor and TOPLink.
>>
>>Jon.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Objectbridge-developers mailing list
> Obj...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers
> 
>