Re: [OJB-developers] HSQLDB performance also bad

[<ri...@ya...>]

Thomas,

How could you get faster results than our "twin xeon" friend here!?!

Thomas:
[ojb] 17.435
[jdbc] 12.065

Jon Barber:
[ojb] 96.75
[jdbc] 65.781


Definitely, something is wrong with your tests.
When I ran my tests, NO other process where running, no antivirus, no M$ =
Messenger, nothing but OJB...


Ricardo


----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Jon Barber" <jon...@ac...>
To: "Ricardo Arg=FCello" <ri...@ya...>
Cc: "Thomas Mahler" <tho...@ho...>; "Jakob Braeuchi" =
<jbr...@ho...>; "objectbridge" =
<obj...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] HSQLDB performance also bad


> OK, for the record, my times from 'build performance' is
>=20
> ojb : 96.75
> jdbc : 65.781
>=20
> This was on HSQL on a twin Intel XEON 1.4Ghz box with 512Mb Win 2000 =
SP2
> Sun JDK 1.3.1_01.
>=20
> I also tried against the PointBase java db running in server mode and=20
> got slightly worse performance (in the order of about 1 second slower =
in=20
> total).
>=20
> I'd love to try the same test through Castor and TOPLink.
>=20
> Jon.
>=20
>