RE: [OJB-developers] Kill the mapping files

[<ll...@li...>]

So given that the only way to store things in OJB is a database now.
Shouldn't OJB store the metadata in the database then.

In the future when a PersistenceBrooker for e.g. XML becomes available.
OJB could persist the metadata as XML.

I just think it is a bad idea to invent a parallel persistence framework
for the metadata.

/Lasse

-----Original Message-----
From: obj...@li...
[mailto:obj...@li...] On Behalf
Of Thomas Mahler
Sent: 27. februar 2002 14:00
To: Christian Sell
Cc: 'ojb'
Subject: Re: [OJB-developers] Kill the mapping files


Hi Christian,

Christian Sell wrote:

> the mapping repository storage architecture should be abstracted such
that
> providing specific mechanisms (XML, SQL, whatever) is a matter of
> implementing a simple interface, IMO.
> 


Exactly! A Mapping tool should not see any of these storage details!


Thomas



_______________________________________________
Objectbridge-developers mailing list
Obj...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-developers