Re: [OJB-developers] RE: Referantial Integrity under ODMG

[Thomas M. <tho...@ho...>]

Hi

Florian wrote:
> 
> I think I have found a solution for this that is able to tell the order of
> the added objects while maintaining the speed of the hashtable for lookups.
> Only removing objects from the table would be more expensive.
> 


great news!
removing of objects is not an issue!



>>
> 
> So this is easy. TransactionImpl.register already resolves References and
> Collections, just the order has to be changed.
> 



Right! Sorry, I forgot to mention that register() can be used as a sample.


> I just added the RI test case to CVS and I hope I can commit the fix today.
> 


I just loaded your stuff from CVS and there is only one failure for the 
delete TestCase.
The changes look quite straightforward.

thanks,

Thomas