Re: AW: [Objectbridge-developers] Re: questions

[David W F. <dw...@la...>]

Mahler Thomas writes:
 > Hi David,
 >=20
 > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
 > > Von: David Forslund [mailto:dw...@la...]
 > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2001 21:11
 > > An: obj...@li...
 > > Betreff: [Objectbridge-developers] Re: questions
 > >=20
 > >=20
 > > I notice that in the ObjectCacheDefaultImpl class which is an=20
 > > implementation of ObjectCache, that it extends
 > > the implementation by adding methods not defined in the ObjectCach=
e=20
 > > interface. =20
 >=20
 > I don't see any public member functions in ObjectCacheDefaultImpl th=
at are
 > not specified in the interface.
 > There are also no direct references to ObjectCacheDefaultImpl method=
s from
 > other part of OJB.
 >=20
 > The only thing I saw is a static method setDebug(boolean) which migh=
t only
 > be useful for internal development.
 >=20

We were using the setDebug method in the earlier version.  That static
method isn't very accessible anymore because of the Factory class.  We
obviously can work around this, and it isn't a big deal.

Thanks,

Dave

 > I can't see any harm here ?
 >=20
 > > This is true in some other classes, too, such
 > > as SequenceManagerDefaultImpl. =20
 >=20
 > I did not find anything of the kind in SequenceManagerDefaultImpl !

You are right.  I think this was true in the last version, but not this=

one.

Thanks,
Dave
 >=20
 > Thus one cannot pass an=20
 > > instance of the=20
 > > ObjectCache around because some
 > > methods aren't defined there.  Is this intentional?   This=20
 > > seems to me to=20
 > > be a slightly strange design pattern.  Usually
 > > I would have a class that implements the interface and then=20
 > > extend that.
 >=20
 > I tried to apply the "Abstract Factory" pattern for all pluggable OJ=
B
 > components.=20
 > If there are any references to methods that are not declared in the
 > respective interface it is clearly an error.
 > If you find any, please tell me. I will also have another code walkt=
hrough
 > to be sure...=20
 >=20
 > Thanks,
 >=20
 > Thomas
 >=20
 > >=20
 > > Thanks,
 > >=20
 > > Dave
 > >=20
 > >=20
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > Objectbridge-developers mailing list
 > > Obj...@li...
 > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/objectbridge-develope=
rs
 > >=20