[Objectbridge-developers] AW: [Fwd: ObJectRelationalBridge]
Brought to you by:
thma
From: Mahler T. <tho...@it...> - 2001-09-25 11:58:07
|
Hi Aurelije, Thanks for your interest, > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: ObJectRelationalBridge > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:48:54 -0700 > From: "Aurelije Zovko" <az...@ma...> > Reply-To: <az...@ma...> > To: <tho...@ho...> > > Hi Thomas, > > My name is Aurelije Zovko. I am working for Maranti Networks, storage > company. I have used TopLink in my previous project. I am > using CocoBase > right know, and I am not satisfied . TopLink is to expensive. > So an open > source mapping code will be an alternative. > I really appreciate TOPLink. There is more than a decade of experience in it and it's full of very good features. Of course it's really expensive. If it's too expensive depends largely on your budget ;-) > When do your relational bridge will be ready for commercial use? > How stable is software? > Did anyone used it in commercial development? > Of course a release number like 0.5.x does not sound like a mature product. But in my eyes OJB is quite stable and reliable. It's the only open source O/R tool that is scalable (it has a concept similar to TOPLinks ServerSession and RemoteSession). There are also several projects using it for production level applications. See the OpenEMed project (http://sourceforge.net/projects/openmed/) as a reference user. On the other hand: OJB is still under development and a lot of things that you can taken for granted with TOPLink are not finished for OJB. My advice: Build a technical prototype of your application that covers the persistence needs and see if OJB fits your needs. Feature requests and bug reports are always welcome ! best regards, Thomas > Regards, > Aurelije > > Aurelije Zovko > Maranti Networks > Principal Software Eng. > 920 Hillview Ct., Ste 280, Milpitas, CA 95035 > > Phone: 408.719.9600 ext.343 > Fax: 408.719.9631 > E-mail: az...@ma... > |