Re: [Objectbridge-developers] XML used in test.ojb.server, etc

[Thomas M. <tho...@ho...>]

Hi David,

first of all: thanks for your interest in OJB!

David Forslund wrote:
> 
> I downloaded and built the 0.1.41 release without any problems.
> However, when I run the JUnit
> tests it seems to get a number of errors:
[...]

Yes, I get the same errors during JUnit runs. 
I have no idea about these errors, because if I
run the testSuites test.ojb.broker.PersistenceBrokerTest,
test.ojb.broker.BrokerExamples, test.ojb.broker.ProxyExamples separately
and not via the embracing suite test.ojb.broker.AllTests there are no
exceptions. I attached a build.xml file with a modified target junit
which you might try to see if you still get exceptions using the
TestSuites separately.

I hope to get rid of this strange thing soon...

> 
> Also, I can't seem to get the examples to work according to the
> documentation.
> "example server" returns no class found.

Mea culpa!
I'm planning to shift all stuff from ojb.examples.* to test.ojb.* for
two reasons:
1. have only library code under ojb.*, no test stuff, no examples
2. To avoid a code doubling between tests and examples I want to rewrite
all examples
   as JUnit tests.

I'm finished with ojb.examples.broker (now contained in TestCase
test.ojb.broker.BrokerExamples)
and with ojb.examples.proxy (now in test.ojb.broker.ProxyExamples)
So "example broker" and "example proxies" will fail (but you get their
replacements executed with "build junit" !)

for "example server" it slightly different:
ojb.examples.server.* is not rewritten as a JUnit TestCase yet.
But unfortunately I turned off compilation for packages
ojb.examples.server and ojb.server in the build.xml :-(

But: I corrected this mistake in the attached build.xml.
So just replace your build.xml with this new version, run "build", run
"example server",
lean back and enjoy the wonders of OJB...

The ojb.server stuff is still work in progress. The server example is
meant to give an impression how programming against an ODMG
implementation will look like. So it's no real loss in not seeing it
running ;-) 

best regards,

Thomas