Menu

#822 prostate gland imported as both class and instance

general
closed
nobody
None
5
2016-09-27
2016-09-17
jzheng
No

http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002367 prostate gland
imported as both class and instance
see: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/obi/dev/import/OBO_imports.owl

Need to check whether it is cause by ontoFox bug or UBERON issue.

Need to be fixed in OBI release

Discussion

  • James A. Overton

    I removed the NamedIndividual declaration from OBO_imports.owl in commit 4079. That will fix the problem for OBI for now.

    Then I looked deeper and found that OntoFox consistently includes the declaration. I can see it in their SPARQL database: http://www.ontobee.org/sparql

    SELECT distinct ?p ?o
    WHERE { 
    GRAPH <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/merged/UBERON>
    { <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002367> ?p ?o } 
    }
    

    But I don't see it in the UBERON OWL files. Weird. I'll ask Chris Mungall.

     

    Last edit: James A. Overton 2016-09-27
  • Chris Mungall

    Chris Mungall - 2016-09-26

    Not in uberon AFAICT.

    Btw, still in SF? I advise migrating before it gets harder... https://github.com/cmungall/gosf2github/

     
  • Chris Mungall

    Chris Mungall - 2016-09-26

    All puns in ontobee:

    prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> 
    prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> 
    SELECT *
    WHERE {
    GRAPH ?g
    { ?x rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual ;
         rdf:type owl:Class }
    }
    

    I assume there is some pattern here, but I'm stumped

     
  • jzheng

    jzheng - 2016-09-27

    Ontobee developer Edison has re-uploaded the UBERON ontology. There is no individual now. Need to rerun Ontofox and check whether the output is correct.

     
  • James A. Overton

    • status: open --> closed
     
  • James A. Overton

    Looks good now.

     

Log in to post a comment.