Re: [Nymserv-devel] Proper behavior of Razor checking

[Bill O'H. <wm...@re...>]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:20:35PM -0500, Michael T. Shinn wrote:
> Initially, we should look at supporting spamassassin before support 
> razor by itself.  Spamassassin has rule sets (and it supports razor), so 
> it does a better job of dealing with the false positive problem than 
> razor by itself.


I'd like to second this.  I use Spamassassin as the spam filtering system
for my users at my ISP, and it's amazingly effective.

-Bill

--
Bill O'Hanlon                                           wm...@re...
Professional Network Services, Inc.                             612-379-3958
http://www.pro-ns.net