Re: [Nxtcommand-developers] Making Icommand ready for different NXTCOMM implementations

[Peter J. <ptg...@ch...>]

On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 02:21 +0100, Peter Joosten wrote:
> We should separate API (for end users) from implementation.
> 
> At this moment from the icommand.nxtcomm package the NXTCommand class is
> part of the API (method close()).
> 
> package icommand.nxtcomm should NOT be part of the API
> 
> Proposal:
> 
> Make an interface NXTCommand in the package icommand.platform.nxt
> with open() and close() methods.
> 

Putting the interface in the "icommand" package would be a good
(/better?) alternative !

> Change access modifiers in icommand.nxtcomm to package (= no access
> modifier) as much as possible to prohibit access by end users. 
> 
> In the distribution Javadoc of package icommand.nxtcomm will not be
> included, since it is no longer part of the API.
> 
> Peter Joosten.
> 
>