Thread: [NUnitAsp-devl] NUnitASP on MbUnit
Brought to you by:
jlittle82
Menu
▾
▴
nunitasp-devl
|
From: Andrew S. <ast...@ds...> - 2004-11-18 00:04:01
|
Hi, I have ported NUnitASP to MbUnit (http://mbunit.tigris.org/) as part of = this port I have changed NUnitASP to use the NUnit 2.2 assert class = rather than the old assertion class. MbUnit has no support for this = older style hench the need to change. I do recall seeing a post that NUnitASP has been upgraded to NUnit 2.2, = is the new syntax in use? If so then to use MbUnit its simply a case of = replacing the NUnit.Framework.dll with MBUnit.Core.dll and = MbUnit.Franework and to referance MbUnit.Core.Framework and = MbUnit.Framework rather than NUnitFramework. Thanks Andrew http://weblogs.asp.net/astopford |
|
From: Jim S. <js...@ti...> - 2004-11-18 00:15:35
|
Hi, Andrew, Thanks for the note. Currently, NUnitAsp support for NUnit 2.2 is in CVS but not yet widely available. I'll be releasing it later this month. The port is just a simple recompile with NUnit 2.2, so nothing's changed so far. For NUnitAsp v1.6, which comes out after NUnit 2.2 support, I hope to remove the dependency on NUnit so NUnitAsp can be used without modification with any testing framework, including MbUnit and csUnit. (This also means people won't have to wait for a new version of NUnitAsp every time a new version of NUnit comes out!) This is the first I've heard of MbUnit. I looked at the web site but I didn't see how MbUnit is different or better than NUnit. Can you explain? Jim -- Jim Shore Titanium I.T. LLC - Making IT Profitable Find my new article, "Fail Fast," in the Sept/Oct issue of IEEE Software. phone: 503-267-5490 email: js...@ti... Andrew Stopford wrote: > Hi, > > I have ported NUnitASP to MbUnit (http://mbunit.tigris.org/) as part > of this port I have changed NUnitASP to use the NUnit 2.2 assert class > rather than the old assertion class. MbUnit has no support for this > older style hench the need to change. > > I do recall seeing a post that NUnitASP has been upgraded to NUnit > 2.2, is the new syntax in use? If so then to use MbUnit its simply a > case of replacing the NUnit.Framework.dll with MBUnit.Core.dll and > MbUnit.Franework and to referance MbUnit.Core.Framework and > MbUnit.Framework rather than NUnitFramework. > > Thanks > > Andrew > http://weblogs.asp.net/astopford |
|
From: Andrew S. <ast...@ds...> - 2004-11-18 00:30:53
|
Hi Jim, Do get a good feel for what MbUnit can do and why its much more (IMHO) powerful than NUnit then check out the posts by its creator Johnathan de Halleux http://blog.dotnetwiki.org/ For MbUnit to work it does require that the new assert class is used in placed of the assertion class as per my previous email. Do you think that NUnitASP will be upgraded to this ahead of a decouple? The decouple idea makes sense, looking forward to seeing folks ideas on this. Thanks Andrew http://weblogs.asp.net/astopford ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Shore" <js...@ti...> To: < Cc: "Andrew Stopford" <ast...@ds...> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 12:15 AM Subject: Re: [NUnitAsp-devl] NUnitASP on MbUnit > Hi, Andrew, > > Thanks for the note. Currently, NUnitAsp support for NUnit 2.2 is in CVS > but not yet widely available. I'll be releasing it later this month. The > port is just a simple recompile with NUnit 2.2, so nothing's changed so > far. > > For NUnitAsp v1.6, which comes out after NUnit 2.2 support, I hope to > remove the dependency on NUnit so NUnitAsp can be used without > modification with any testing framework, including MbUnit and csUnit. > (This also means people won't have to wait for a new version of NUnitAsp > every time a new version of NUnit comes out!) > > This is the first I've heard of MbUnit. I looked at the web site but I > didn't see how MbUnit is different or better than NUnit. Can you explain? > > Jim > > -- > Jim Shore > Titanium I.T. LLC - Making IT Profitable > Find my new article, "Fail Fast," in the Sept/Oct issue of IEEE Software. > > phone: 503-267-5490 > email: js...@ti... > > > Andrew Stopford wrote: > >> Hi, >> I have ported NUnitASP to MbUnit (http://mbunit.tigris.org/) as part of >> this port I have changed NUnitASP to use the NUnit 2.2 assert class >> rather than the old assertion class. MbUnit has no support for this older >> style hench the need to change. >> I do recall seeing a post that NUnitASP has been upgraded to NUnit 2.2, >> is the new syntax in use? If so then to use MbUnit its simply a case of >> replacing the NUnit.Framework.dll with MBUnit.Core.dll and >> MbUnit.Franework and to referance MbUnit.Core.Framework and >> MbUnit.Framework rather than NUnitFramework. >> Thanks >> Andrew >> http://weblogs.asp.net/astopford > > |
|
From: Jim S. <js...@ti...> - 2004-11-18 00:53:17
|
Andrew Stopford wrote: > Do get a good feel for what MbUnit can do and why its much more (IMHO) > powerful than NUnit then check out the posts by its creator Johnathan > de Halleux http://blog.dotnetwiki.org/ Thanks, I'll take a look. > For MbUnit to work it does require that the new assert class is used > in placed of the assertion class as per my previous email. Do you > think that NUnitASP will be upgraded to this ahead of a decouple? Probably not, unless decoupling NUnitAsp from NUnit turns out to be a bigger problem than I expected. Jim -- Jim Shore Titanium I.T. LLC - Making IT Profitable Find my new article, "Fail Fast," in the Sept/Oct issue of IEEE Software. phone: 503-267-5490 email: js...@ti... |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X